looks better, something to try next time, thanks!

Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-04-21 11:59 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>:
> I mean
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/6.diff
>
>    --
>     Jean-Louis Monteiro
>     http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>     http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
>> add .diff instead of .patch should be enough
>>
>>    --
>>     Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>     http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>     http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> patch -p0 < 6.patch
>>>
>>> Oops that's a git patch and then you need a good bash script to get it on
>>> svn or simply apply it on git then diff in svn format...not efficient and
>>> on update/upgrade patches can just be too hard.
>>> Le 20 avr. 2014 21:24, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit
>>> :
>>>
>>> > What approach did you take?  The patch approach should be the same as
>>> svn:
>>> >
>>> >  - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/6.patch
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Apr 20, 2014, at 1:08 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > It was but svn/git doesnt work together well enough to have it working
>>> > > well. If we were on git it would be nice.
>>> > > Le 20 avr. 2014 20:44, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a
>>> > écrit :
>>> > >
>>> > >> I think when you submitted your patch the asf hadn't yet improved the
>>> > >> github integration.  Daniel Gruno (@Humbedooh) has put a lot of work
>>> > into
>>> > >> and would probably do more if we had more ideas for him.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -David
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Apr 19, 2014, at 9:19 AM, Ivan St. Ivanov <
>>> ivan.st.iva...@gmail.com>
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>> Hey folks!
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Before you start reviewing and merging, maybe it's a good idea for
>>> > >> everyone
>>> > >>> of us that has submitted a pull request, to review it. When I did
>>> > mine, I
>>> > >>> didn't know that the official path to contribute something was SVN
>>> > >> patches.
>>> > >>> So after I understood that, I made the same change as SVN patch and
>>> it
>>> > >> was
>>> > >>> merged. That is why I just closed my pull request. Maybe everyone
>>> that
>>> > >>> knows that their pull request was then merged as SVN patch, should
>>> do
>>> > the
>>> > >>> same.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> Cheers,
>>> > >>> Ivan
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 1:33 AM, Alan Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com
>>> >
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> On Apr 18, 2014, at 3:07 PM, David Blevins <
>>> david.blev...@gmail.com>
>>> > >>>> wrote:
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>> This is probably not the full list of patches yet to be applied,
>>> but
>>> > a
>>> > >>>> definite good start:
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> - https://github.com/apache/tomee/pulls
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> Andy or anyone else, possible to get some of these cleared out?
>>>  The
>>> > >>>> ASF-Github integration now puts full details on how to deal with
>>> > >> external
>>> > >>>> pull requests in the related JIRA:
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> -
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-1154?focusedCommentId=13974390&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13974390
>>> > >>>>>
>>> > >>>>> I'm pretty excited about this improved integration.  It has
>>> > >> historically
>>> > >>>> been very hard to track patches in a JIRA with a few thousand
>>> items.
>>> >  An
>>> > >>>> actual queue of patch "TODOs" can really do us some good.
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Some of the above pull requests don't seem to have a handy comment
>>> a
>>> > to
>>> > >>>> what to do and some have no corresponding Jira.  Do we just review
>>> and
>>> > >>>> commit?
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>> Regards,
>>> > >>>> Alan
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>>>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to