Does it mean we drop the ssh module? Why ot going incubator to promote the portability of these projects? (Whatever you do, if tomee subproject it is perceived as tomee bound). Are they too small?
Why not geronimo subprojects since it is the official umbrella project now - vs tomee is not until we rediscuss it transprojects. Really sounds weird to me to try to push it in tomee when we agreed to do it in G weeks ago, what am I missing? Le 11 août 2017 22:58, "David Blevins" <david.blev...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > On Aug 11, 2017, at 3:20 AM, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID> > wrote: > > > > Reusable components make sense they are clearly distinctable. The part > which contains that reusable components imo must get a different brand name > than TomEE. > > Sheldon would stay named Sheldon. Chatterbox would stay named > Chatterbox. They’d get their own JIRAs. They’d just be hosted here on you > could get to them via the tomee.apache.org website. > > > The problem here is: TomEE does a really bad job in pointing out these > ties! If TomEE would kind of cumulate this progress and make it clear that > this makes it into TomEE, then it would be much clearer that there is no > standstill but actually tons of activity. > > I think this is a great topic you should lead. > > > -David > >
