We can keep any existing ssh code if we like. In terms of why TomEE, as mentioned here’s are some of the benefits:
- show the TomEE ecosystem is a bit bigger than just the server - provide a clear pattern for “crazy new ideas” to start here that could potentially benefit TomEE or other EE related-projects - more opportunities to earn commit - give the community a boost We used to get a lot of committers in based on EJB improvements, however since that spec has slowed and is not moving forward, I think we need more opportunities for people to earn commit. In terms of G. Obviously as co-founder of the project and someone who spent 9+ years on it full-time under 3 different employers, I have a different relationship to the name. I think it’s great there’s new blood in G, including you, imagining a new future for it. But my heart is really in TomEE. When I look at Geronimo I see my past, when I look at TomEE I see my future. Everyone is entitled to his or her own goals, hopes and dreams, I just want to be clear where my heart is at. -- David Blevins http://twitter.com/dblevins http://www.tomitribe.com > On Aug 11, 2017, at 11:43 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Does it mean we drop the ssh module? > > Why ot going incubator to promote the portability of these projects? > (Whatever you do, if tomee subproject it is perceived as tomee bound). Are > they too small? > > Why not geronimo subprojects since it is the official umbrella project now > - vs tomee is not until we rediscuss it transprojects. > > Really sounds weird to me to try to push it in tomee when we agreed to do > it in G weeks ago, what am I missing? > > Le 11 août 2017 22:58, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : > >>> On Aug 11, 2017, at 3:20 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Reusable components make sense they are clearly distinctable. The part >> which contains that reusable components imo must get a different brand name >> than TomEE. >> >> Sheldon would stay named Sheldon. Chatterbox would stay named >> Chatterbox. They’d get their own JIRAs. They’d just be hosted here on you >> could get to them via the tomee.apache.org website. >> >>> The problem here is: TomEE does a really bad job in pointing out these >> ties! If TomEE would kind of cumulate this progress and make it clear that >> this makes it into TomEE, then it would be much clearer that there is no >> standstill but actually tons of activity. >> >> I think this is a great topic you should lead. >> >> >> -David >> >>
