If I'm not mistaken this should be up to date
http://tomcat.apache.org/taglibs/site/building.html


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>

2017-10-10 19:08 GMT+02:00 Matthew Broadhead <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk
>:

> is that something i can take a look at? is it in openejb?
>
>
> On 10/10/2017 18:21, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>
>> Yes fix taglib as identified since last year ;)
>>
>> Le 10 oct. 2017 16:05, "Matthew Broadhead" <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u
>> k>
>> a écrit :
>>
>> is there a cure for this?  we previously tried to exclude other versions
>>> of xalan from the pom but it didn't work
>>>
>>> On 10/10/2017 16:33, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
>>>
>>> Yep
>>>>
>>>> It is one of the reasons why we dont want xalan in tomee lib folder -
>>>> fop
>>>> is not particular since xalan is very common
>>>>
>>>> Le 10 oct. 2017 15:03, "Matthew Broadhead"
>>>> <matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.u
>>>> k>
>>>> a écrit :
>>>>
>>>> with 7.0.4 i am getting this
>>>>
>>>>> java.lang.ClassCastException: org.apache.xml.dtm.ref.DTMManagerDefault
>>>>> cannot be cast to org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager
>>>>>       at org.apache.xml.dtm.DTMManager.newInstance(DTMManager.java:13
>>>>> 7)
>>>>>       at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:102)
>>>>>       at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:349)
>>>>>       at org.apache.xpath.XPathContext.<init>(XPathContext.java:337)
>>>>>       at org.apache.xalan.transformer.TransformerImpl.<init>(Transfor
>>>>> merImpl.java:397)
>>>>>       at org.apache.xalan.templates.StylesheetRoot.newTransformer(Sty
>>>>> lesheetRoot.java:200)
>>>>>
>>>>> with 7.0.3 it happened sometimes if i redeployed a webapp.  Romain said
>>>>> it
>>>>> was the class loader mixing xalan versions.  i include apache fop in
>>>>> one
>>>>> of
>>>>> my projects in case that helps but mostly try to stick to TomEE stack
>>>>>
>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:24, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> That's awesome, thank you for the feedback so far!
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:22 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Jon,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That is good as I wanted to test the 7.0.4 with my development setup.
>>>>>>> So
>>>>>>> I downloaded the apache-tomee-7.0.4-plus.tar.gz and i am running it
>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>> local machine in place of 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It has started up fine and no problems so far.  I will just keep
>>>>>>> working
>>>>>>> and report back if there are any issues
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 17:14, Jonathan Gallimore wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's the staging repo for the vote - if the vote passes, its those
>>>>>>>> binaries that will be promoted as version 7.0.4. Snapshots won't be
>>>>>>>> deployed here (they'll go to here:
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/ I
>>>>>>>> believe). I
>>>>>>>> think
>>>>>>>> there is an issue with the buildbot job that deploys these, so if
>>>>>>>> you're
>>>>>>>> waiting on a snapshot, let us know and I can deploy one manually.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 4:07 PM, Matthew Broadhead <
>>>>>>>> matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> are the dist builds still at https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/tomee-7.0.4/?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 09/10/2017 14:58, Mark Struberg wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi folks!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry for the delay!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Running the new 7.0.4 attempt with a few customer projects now.
>>>>>>>>>> Will ping back once I know more.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> txs and LieGrue,
>>>>>>>>>> strub
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 08.10.2017 um 16:43 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It is http://repository.apache.org/snapshots/
>>>>>>>>>>> (openejb.deployer.snapshot.repository
>>>>>>>>>>> system property) but there is not yet a 8 snapshot
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:26 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <alex.m3...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But how to find the repo for TomEE 8.0.0 based testing?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 16:20 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> you can set as system property (through surefire)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> openejb.deployer.repository=<the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> repo>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 14:07 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Romain,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for your answer:I  was able to run my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilian
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> test by adding the following line into my projet's pom.xml:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         <repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             <repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 <id>my-tomee704repo</id>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 <name>TomEE704 repo</name>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                 <url>https://repository.apache.org/content/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/</url>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>             </repository>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>         </repositories>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (and by the way my feedback on TomEE 7.0.4 is still +1)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Question: in the general case, how one can tell which is the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate repository URL to use Arquilian which a TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which isn't yet officialized?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For example, if I want to try TomEE+ 8.0.0, the above
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> repository
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> does't allow to resolve dependencies on:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                         <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                         <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-e
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mbedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                         <version>8.0.0</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So what's the "rule of thumb"? (and can it be documented
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> somewhere
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee.apache.org?)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:51 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Alex: did you add this repo https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1107/ ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rmannibucau> |
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-08 10:48 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am starting to use Arquilian, in particular in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> check
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> impact of TomEE+ version changes on our REST services
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (annotations
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sometimes change, such as the introduction of @JohnzonIgnore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> + 7.x).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I naively tried changing my dependency from 7.0.3 to 7.0.4,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not being resolved:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     <dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                         <groupId>org.apache.tomee</groupId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                         <artifactId>arquillian-tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded</artifactId>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>                         <version>7.0.4</version> <!--Current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -->
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>                     </dependency>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess that this is because TomEE 7.0.4 isn't yet
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> officialized.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But yet, I fell that it would be great if I could use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> current
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate with Arqulian in order to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> give
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this RC before it's final.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What would be the simplest way to setup my pom.xml in order
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> run
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arquilan tests using latest TomEE+ 7.0.4 release candidate,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *using
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> embedded adapter* ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (I guess that using the remote adapter with the RC I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> downloaded
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alternative, but yet I want also the use embedded version).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:29 GMT+02:00 Alex The Rocker <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> alex.m3...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you very much for your answer. I already voted a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my applicative tests which showed no regressions of this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vs. TomEE+ 7.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I can wait for a week for the "final freeze" :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-10-05 19:25 GMT+02:00 Andy Gumbrecht <andy...@gmx.de
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote is open for 'at least' 72 hours, or until we get
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know that many of the guys are ultra busy with JavaOne at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> moment,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> so I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't expect to get a response until next week.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The review process is basically downloading the binaries and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> checking
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for complete functionality. That includes running apps and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> testing
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> everything possible, including the legal headers etc. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> always
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> takes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time, but we do it to ensure you get a good distribution.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for your understanding. We still really appreciate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes, which should mean that you have just as thoroughly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tested
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> environments. The more eyes on, the better!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm adding my binding vote, as I have not found any issues:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/17 00:42, Alex The Rocker wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Andy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you please specific until when this vote for TomEE+
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 7.0.4
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> supposed to last?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-28 13:37 GMT+02:00 Felipe Jaekel <fkjae...@gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2017-09-26 18:24 GMT-03:00 Andy Gumbrecht <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agumbre...@tomitribe.com>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd kindly like to ask you all to take a look at this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> build
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> votes for a 7.0.4 release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The re-roll updates to CXF 3.1.13 and JAXB 2.3.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Provided).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I added comments in the previous vote that relate to Java
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> experimental and requires the following (corrected)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> flag:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --add-module java.xml.bind
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> content/repositories/orgapache
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-1107/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.0.4/tomee-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project-7.0.4-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tomee-7.0.4/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dist/dev/tomee/staging-1107/to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mee-7.0.4/legal.zip
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changelog:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?proje
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ctId=12312320&version=12339959
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Green buildbot:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders/tomee-trunk-ubuntu-
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jvm8/builds/725
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/builders
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /tomee-trunk-ubuntu/builds/839
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The RAT report indicates 0 Unknown Licenses.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       +1: Release
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>       -1 Do not release because ... See below.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you vote -1 then please create a JIRA ticket here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/TOMEE -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Include
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> information as possible and, if applicable, a unit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> test.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (At
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everyone, committer or not, is encouraged to test and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> very
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> much for your time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Andy Gumbrecht.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>

Reply via email to