Le jeu. 9 août 2018 à 07:53, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> a écrit :
> > > > We can definitely vote, but would be great if we can way a day or two to > > discuss what we'd be voting and what our status is and how to best > address > > our concerns. > > > +1 > > > > We all universally agree we want MP in TomEE 8 and are actively working > on > > it > > > I am not sure there is an active MP work in TomEE > > > > Some of us see value in and are actively working on MP support in a TomEE > > 7.1 in addition to TomEE 8 > > > From my perspective, I would like to have fully latest MP2 in TomEE 8, not > in TomEE 7.1 but I am not against it. Currently we have little power. > +1, we must also keep in mind there was no activity on MP impl in TomEE except jwt auth which was mainly a fork and has still some clean up to do (sout etc). The concern here is the possible investment and being disruptive to try to do a 7.1 which requires 4 (or 7 depending the target) impl compared to just focus on TomEE 8 which has all of them. > > My understanding of the concern is that we end up ignoring TomEE 8, which > > is a concern I would share. > > > I did not understand what you mean by ignoring TomEE 8 .Can you please a > bit elaborate? Who ignore? > > > Perhaps the most effective vote would be to vote to require those who do > > work on a TomEE 7.1 to also submit the same PR to TomEE 8. If a PR comes > > into TomEE 7.1 only and that work is needed in TomEE 8, but there isn't a > > PR, we reject it. > > > -1. Different people can work on TomEE 7.1 and TomEE 8. We need to > differentiate TomEE 7.1 from TomEE 8. TomEE 7.1 is just in there to only > include MP1. We don't want to wait TomEE 7.1 for TomEE 8. > +1 > > > We remind the person we voted that TomEE 8 is the priority and TomEE 7.1 > > work can happen as long as we don't ignore TomEE 8. > > > Our priority must be TomEE 8. > > If someone wants to submit an MicroProfile PR to TomEE 8 only, go right > > ahead, those who want to see a TomEE 7.1 will have to back port it if > > they're serious about a TomEE 7.1 > > > ++1, exactly. MP2 must be started in TomEE 8 and if want to see at TomEE > 7.1, any volunteer can back port to it. > > Regards. > Gurkan > > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 2:10 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > On Aug 8, 2018, at 2:48 PM, Gurkan Erdogdu <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> What I don't understand on this is that if there are people willing to > > do > > >> the work on both, why would we stop them? Delivering to both the Java > > EE 7 > > >> and Java EE 8 TomEE users would be a good thing. > > >> > > > I am not against both Java EE 7 and Java EE 8 specific MP > > implementations. > > > Just need to have contribution power both on this. We can definitely > add > > > this option to the vote thread. So the vote will include: > > > > > > - Go only with MP1 with Java EE 7 (TomEE 7.1) > > > - Go only with MP2 with Java EE 8 (TomEE 8.0) > > > - Go for both > > > > We can definitely vote, but would be great if we can way a day or two to > > discuss what we'd be voting and what our status is and how to best > address > > our concerns. > > > > Here's my understanding of our status. > > > > - We all universally agree we want MP in TomEE 8 and are actively > working > > on it > > - Some of us see value in and are actively working on MP support in a > > TomEE 7.1 in addition to TomEE 8 > > > > I haven't seen anyone propose a TomEE 7.1-only option. My understanding > > of the concern is that we end up ignoring TomEE 8, which is a concern I > > would share. > > > > Perhaps the most effective vote would be to vote to require those who do > > work on a TomEE 7.1 to also submit the same PR to TomEE 8. If a PR comes > > into TomEE 7.1 only and that work is needed in TomEE 8, but there isn't a > > PR, we reject it. We remind the person we voted that TomEE 8 is the > > priority and TomEE 7.1 work can happen as long as we don't ignore TomEE > 8. > > If someone wants to submit an MicroProfile PR to TomEE 8 only, go right > > ahead, those who want to see a TomEE 7.1 will have to back port it if > > they're serious about a TomEE 7.1 > > > > I'd certainly vote +1 for that. > > > > > > -David > > > > >
