Is this really a common case?

I'd rather would continue the vote and ship a 7.0.1 shortly afterwards (say 2 
weeks).

That way we can get feedback from users and improve upon it.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 31.08.2018 um 17:25 schrieb Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>:
> 
> Sweet! Tx!
> 
> []s,
> Thiago.
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:20 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> [email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Assuming we re-roll (which looks likely), yes, I'll include it.
>> 
>> Jon
>> 
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:12 PM Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> The change I did for the the Injection of Application seems to be out of
>>> this release. :/
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/bf929780ae384de305388594c7227c73a3193f9a
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2201
>>> 
>>> Do you mind if we add it to 71x?
>>> 
>>> []s,
>>> Thiago.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:01 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Roberto - did you have a test/sample app for this?
>>>> 
>>>> Looks like the microprofile zip is short of a NOTICE file, and that
>> would
>>>> need to include the same notices as webprofile, plus this one:
>>>> 
>>>> (
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://bitbucket.org/b_c/jose4j/src/7f9624414a1baf752adbc61d4a1be16253eeec23/NOTICE.txt?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
>>>> )
>>>> -----
>>>> jose4j
>>>> Copyright 2012-2015 Brian Campbell
>>>> 
>>>> EcdsaUsingShaAlgorithm contains code for converting the concatenated
>>>> R & S values of the signature to and from DER, which was originally
>>>> derived from the Apache Santuario XML Security library's SignatureECDSA
>>>> implementation. http://santuario.apache.org/
>>>> 
>>>> The Base64 implementation in this software was derived from the
>>>> Apache Commons Codec project.
>>>> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/
>>>> 
>>>> JSON processing in this software was derived from the JSON.simple
>>> toolkit.
>>>> https://code.google.com/p/json-simple/
>>>> -----
>>>> 
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>> 
>>>> Other than that I can't see any issues.
>>>> 
>>>> Jon
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:39 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> +1
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thank you very much Jon for the release and Roberto for the
>>> microprofile
>>>>> work
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Mark Struberg
>>> <[email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> LieGrue,
>>>>>> strub
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Am 30.08.2018 um 12:24 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Here is the first roll of TomEE 7.1.0. Please can you take a look
>>> and
>>>>>>> vote? Everyone,
>>>>>>> committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Staging repo:
>>>>>>> 
>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1119
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Source zip:
>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>>> orgapachetomee-1119/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.
>>>>>> 1.0/tomee-project-7.1.0-source-release.zip
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Dist area:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1119/
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Legal:
>>>>>>> 
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1119/legal.zip
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Keys:
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Please vote:
>>>>>>> +1: Release
>>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
>>>> least
>>>>> 3
>>>>>>> binding votes).
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Many thanks
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to