You can generate swagger.json at byild time, no need to bring jackson and
friznd in the runrime just for that ;). Also cxf has a custom integ.

Le ven. 31 août 2018 21:08, Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]> a écrit :

> I did not vote minus one because of that. I don't think we inject
> Application very often, but the swagger team does.
> If we don't add this change there, we will not be able to use...
>
>         <dependency>
>             <groupId>io.swagger.core.v3</groupId>
>             <artifactId>swagger-jaxrs2</artifactId>
>             <version>2.0.1</version>
>         </dependency>
>
> INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
> Service URI: http://localhost:8080/api/openapi                   -> Pojo
> io.swagger.v3.jaxrs2.integration.resources.AcceptHeaderOpenApiResource
> INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
>        GET http://localhost:8080/api/openapi/                  ->
> Response getOpenApiJson(HttpHeaders, UriInfo) throws Exception
> INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
>        GET http://localhost:8080/api/openapi/                  ->
> Response getOpenApiYaml(HttpHeaders, UriInfo) throws Exception
> INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
> Service URI: http://localhost:8080/api/openapi.{type:json|yaml}  -> Pojo
> io.swagger.v3.jaxrs2.integration.resources.OpenApiResource
> INFO org.apache.openejb.server.cxf.rs.CxfRsHttpListener logEndpoints
>        GET http://localhost:8080/api/openapi.{type:json|yaml}/ ->
> Response getOpenApi(HttpHeaders, UriInfo, String) throws Exception
>
> ... with this version of TomEE.
>
> It's not critical; But if we re-roll, it would be awesome to add that in
> there.
>
> []s,
> Thiago.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:50 PM Mark Struberg <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Is this really a common case?
> >
> > I'd rather would continue the vote and ship a 7.0.1 shortly afterwards
> > (say 2 weeks).
> >
> > That way we can get feedback from users and improve upon it.
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> > > Am 31.08.2018 um 17:25 schrieb Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>:
> > >
> > > Sweet! Tx!
> > >
> > > []s,
> > > Thiago.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:20 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Assuming we re-roll (which looks likely), yes, I'll include it.
> > >>
> > >> Jon
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 4:12 PM Thiago Veronezi <[email protected]>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> The change I did for the the Injection of Application seems to be out
> > of
> > >>> this release. :/
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/commit/bf929780ae384de305388594c7227c73a3193f9a
> > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2201
> > >>>
> > >>> Do you mind if we add it to 71x?
> > >>>
> > >>> []s,
> > >>> Thiago.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 11:01 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
> > >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Roberto - did you have a test/sample app for this?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Looks like the microprofile zip is short of a NOTICE file, and that
> > >> would
> > >>>> need to include the same notices as webprofile, plus this one:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> (
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> https://bitbucket.org/b_c/jose4j/src/7f9624414a1baf752adbc61d4a1be16253eeec23/NOTICE.txt?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default
> > >>>> )
> > >>>> -----
> > >>>> jose4j
> > >>>> Copyright 2012-2015 Brian Campbell
> > >>>>
> > >>>> EcdsaUsingShaAlgorithm contains code for converting the concatenated
> > >>>> R & S values of the signature to and from DER, which was originally
> > >>>> derived from the Apache Santuario XML Security library's
> > SignatureECDSA
> > >>>> implementation. http://santuario.apache.org/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> The Base64 implementation in this software was derived from the
> > >>>> Apache Commons Codec project.
> > >>>> http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-codec/
> > >>>>
> > >>>> JSON processing in this software was derived from the JSON.simple
> > >>> toolkit.
> > >>>> https://code.google.com/p/json-simple/
> > >>>> -----
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thoughts?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Other than that I can't see any issues.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Jon
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 2:39 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > >>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> +1
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Thank you very much Jon for the release and Roberto for the
> > >>> microprofile
> > >>>>> work
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> --
> > >>>>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > >>>>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > >>>>> http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 1:33 PM, Mark Struberg
> > >>> <[email protected]
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> +1
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> LieGrue,
> > >>>>>> strub
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Am 30.08.2018 um 12:24 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore <
> > >>>>>> [email protected]>:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Hi Everyone,
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Here is the first roll of TomEE 7.1.0. Please can you take a look
> > >>> and
> > >>>>>>> vote? Everyone,
> > >>>>>>> committer or not, is encouraged to test and vote.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Staging repo:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1119
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Source zip:
> > >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > >>>>>> orgapachetomee-1119/org/apache/tomee/tomee-project/7.
> > >>>>>> 1.0/tomee-project-7.1.0-source-release.zip
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Dist area:
> > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1119/
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Legal:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1119/legal.zip
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Keys:
> > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Please vote:
> > >>>>>>> +1: Release
> > >>>>>>> -1 Do not release because ...
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> The vote will be open for 3 days or the consensus is binding (At
> > >>>> least
> > >>>>> 3
> > >>>>>>> binding votes).
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Many thanks
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Jon
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to