I'm generally ok with this, and it looks like there is plenty of support
for it. Some questions:

* would we include the existing proposals?
* I think 1 week is fine for the final vote, but wonder if we'd want to
allow a bit longer to create the actual submissions?

The ASF voting process is documented here:
https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html - I can't see any reason why
we couldn't use GitHub for that, but I think we'd need to post a thread on
this mailing list (and probably the user mailing list as well) so its very
clear.

Jon

On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:52 PM Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> The idea I had in mind is:
>
> 1 - Give a 1 week time for people to advocate for a logo. (Share the logo
> in github issue)
> 2 - Give a 1 week time for voting (we would gather all the logos that
> people advocated for and add to another github issue and ask for thumbs up)
>
> The logo that gets more thumbs up in a range of a week wins!
>
> So, not asking for +1 in a specific logo, but for the willingness of the
> community to choose a logo using a poll mechanism.
>
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:37 AM Richard Monson-Haefel <
> monsonhae...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ivan,
> >
> > Your call to action on this is awesome but what exactly are we +1ing
> > about?  The act of considering a logo or are we +1ing David's Logo (by
> the
> > way the link on your post didn't work for me personally).
> >
> > thanks!
> >
> > Richard
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Would be nice to get some +1 or -1 from some committers here :)
> > >
> > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 9:31 PM Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Bruno Baptista
> > > > https://twitter.com/brunobat_
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 28/12/18 16:32, Ivan Junckes Filho wrote:
> > > > > Hey guys, we have been through this discussion before but I don't
> > think
> > > > we
> > > > > ever had a conclusion. In my opinion would be very important for
> the
> > > > > project to have a logo and now TomEE is getting a lot of exposure
> why
> > > not
> > > > > take advantage of the moment and promote TomEE even more with a
> great
> > > > logo?
> > > > >
> > > > > These are some options proposed in the past:
> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-574
> > > > >
> > > > > We could do something like David did here for JakartaEE:
> > > > > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/ee4j/issues/11
> > > > >
> > > > > And the winning logo would be the one with the most number of
> thumbs
> > > up.
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you guys think?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Richard Monson-Haefel
> > https://twitter.com/rmonson
> > https://www.linkedin.com/in/monsonhaefel/
> >
>

Reply via email to