Good question. There is some more information here: https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/pmcs. I think we'd need to check for copyright / trademark infringement.
There is also an ASF page listing current project logos: http://www.apache.org/logos/ - note that TomEE already has one on there: [image: Snip20190103_1.png] Jon On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 11:44 AM Roberto Cortez <radcor...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote: > I’m wondering if we don’t have to go through some legal process first to > make sure that we can whatever logo wins? > > > On 3 Jan 2019, at 11:33, Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'm generally ok with this, and it looks like there is plenty of support > > for it. Some questions: > > > > * would we include the existing proposals? > > * I think 1 week is fine for the final vote, but wonder if we'd want to > > allow a bit longer to create the actual submissions? > > > > The ASF voting process is documented here: > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html - I can't see any reason > why > > we couldn't use GitHub for that, but I think we'd need to post a thread > on > > this mailing list (and probably the user mailing list as well) so its > very > > clear. > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:52 PM Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com > > > > wrote: > > > >> The idea I had in mind is: > >> > >> 1 - Give a 1 week time for people to advocate for a logo. (Share the > logo > >> in github issue) > >> 2 - Give a 1 week time for voting (we would gather all the logos that > >> people advocated for and add to another github issue and ask for thumbs > up) > >> > >> The logo that gets more thumbs up in a range of a week wins! > >> > >> So, not asking for +1 in a specific logo, but for the willingness of the > >> community to choose a logo using a poll mechanism. > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:37 AM Richard Monson-Haefel < > >> monsonhae...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi Ivan, > >>> > >>> Your call to action on this is awesome but what exactly are we +1ing > >>> about? The act of considering a logo or are we +1ing David's Logo (by > >> the > >>> way the link on your post didn't work for me personally). > >>> > >>> thanks! > >>> > >>> Richard > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ivan Junckes Filho < > ivanjunc...@gmail.com > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Would be nice to get some +1 or -1 from some committers here :) > >>>> > >>>> On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 9:31 PM Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> +1 > >>>>> > >>>>> Bruno Baptista > >>>>> https://twitter.com/brunobat_ > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On 28/12/18 16:32, Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: > >>>>>> Hey guys, we have been through this discussion before but I don't > >>> think > >>>>> we > >>>>>> ever had a conclusion. In my opinion would be very important for > >> the > >>>>>> project to have a logo and now TomEE is getting a lot of exposure > >> why > >>>> not > >>>>>> take advantage of the moment and promote TomEE even more with a > >> great > >>>>> logo? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> These are some options proposed in the past: > >>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-574 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> We could do something like David did here for JakartaEE: > >>>>>> https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/ee4j/issues/11 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> And the winning logo would be the one with the most number of > >> thumbs > >>>> up. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> What do you guys think? > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Richard Monson-Haefel > >>> https://twitter.com/rmonson > >>> https://www.linkedin.com/in/monsonhaefel/ > >>> > >> > >
