On Thu, Jan 3, 2019 at 9:33 AM Jonathan Gallimore < jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm generally ok with this, and it looks like there is plenty of support > for it. Some questions: > > * would we include the existing proposals? > It would include the logos people advocate for. Anyone can go on the list of the old logos and advocate for one of them. > * I think 1 week is fine for the final vote, but wonder if we'd want to > allow a bit longer to create the actual submissions? > That is fine, it can be 2 weeks for logo advocating + 1 week for voting. > > The ASF voting process is documented here: > https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html - I can't see any reason why > we couldn't use GitHub for that, but I think we'd need to post a thread on > this mailing list (and probably the user mailing list as well) so its very > clear. > > +1 > Jon > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 1:52 PM Ivan Junckes Filho <ivanjunc...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > The idea I had in mind is: > > > > 1 - Give a 1 week time for people to advocate for a logo. (Share the logo > > in github issue) > > 2 - Give a 1 week time for voting (we would gather all the logos that > > people advocated for and add to another github issue and ask for thumbs > up) > > > > The logo that gets more thumbs up in a range of a week wins! > > > > So, not asking for +1 in a specific logo, but for the willingness of the > > community to choose a logo using a poll mechanism. > > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 11:37 AM Richard Monson-Haefel < > > monsonhae...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Ivan, > > > > > > Your call to action on this is awesome but what exactly are we +1ing > > > about? The act of considering a logo or are we +1ing David's Logo (by > > the > > > way the link on your post didn't work for me personally). > > > > > > thanks! > > > > > > Richard > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 5:40 AM Ivan Junckes Filho < > ivanjunc...@gmail.com > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Would be nice to get some +1 or -1 from some committers here :) > > > > > > > > On Fri, Dec 28, 2018 at 9:31 PM Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > > > Bruno Baptista > > > > > https://twitter.com/brunobat_ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 28/12/18 16:32, Ivan Junckes Filho wrote: > > > > > > Hey guys, we have been through this discussion before but I don't > > > think > > > > > we > > > > > > ever had a conclusion. In my opinion would be very important for > > the > > > > > > project to have a logo and now TomEE is getting a lot of exposure > > why > > > > not > > > > > > take advantage of the moment and promote TomEE even more with a > > great > > > > > logo? > > > > > > > > > > > > These are some options proposed in the past: > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-574 > > > > > > > > > > > > We could do something like David did here for JakartaEE: > > > > > > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/ee4j/issues/11 > > > > > > > > > > > > And the winning logo would be the one with the most number of > > thumbs > > > > up. > > > > > > > > > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Richard Monson-Haefel > > > https://twitter.com/rmonson > > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/monsonhaefel/ > > > > > >
