Hi Jon, thanks for the explanation.
The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven staging repository? Is this known/planned in this way? I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) with the 9.0.0-M2 artifacts. Thanks, Richard Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message: > > > Hi folks > > Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far. > > I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to > briefly address. > > The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You > can't > vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can > cancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we > wish. > I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're producing the binary > that > uses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it to produce the version > that > uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so going forward. > > We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you can > report > issues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the release. I > totally understand that migrating your own projects to the jakarta > namespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a vote. If > you can > check you can download it and boot it up, and check for any legal > issues, > bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an example app to try, > do try > building the moviefun example. That (like many of the examples) > produces > both javax and jakarta .war files. > > Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is fantastic. > A > couple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not expecting a full > pass, > but I'm also not expecting regressions, so passing the TCK shouldn't > block > the release. I did have to comment out the new security module (sorry > - > there were some JAX-RS test failures with it), so those tests still > won't > pass. > > Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may have. > Many > thanks again for your reviews. > > Jon > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi folks > > > > Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far. > > > > I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to > > briefly address. > > > > The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You > > can't > > vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I > > can close > > this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we > > wish. > > > > I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax > > (8.0.4) and > > then transforming it to produce the version that uses jakarta > > (9.0.0-M2). > > > > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and > > > Apache > > > TomEE 8.0.4. > > > > > > > > > Maven Repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/ > > > > > > Binaries & Source: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/ > > > > > > Source code: > > > TomEE 8.0.4: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip > > > TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2: > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip > > > > > > Tags: > > > > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4 > > > > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2 > > > > > > Release notes: > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12348414 > > > > > > Please VOTE: > > > > > > [+1] Yes, release it > > > [+0] Not fussed > > > [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what > > > the > > > showstopper is) > > > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > > > Here is my +1. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Jon > > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature