Hi,

I've checked the artifacts and played a bit with the plus server.

+1

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 2:58 PM Zowalla, Richard <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the exaplantion, Jon. I will take a look at the transformer and
> apply it to our application after I have returned from vacation.
>
> For now:
>
> Take my +1 (although I've only tested 8.0.4 as stated in my original mail).
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 12:41 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
>
> Hi Richard
>
>
> The artifacts are here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/org/apache/tomee/jakarta/apache-tomee/9.0.0-M2/
>
>
> (note the org.apache.tomee.jakarta group ID).
>
>
> The transformation tool currently only works on zips, which is why we don't
>
> (yet) have tar.gzs there.
>
>
> Its worth taking a look at the Eclipse Transformer to transform your
>
> applications. This is another case where I'd expect issues, and encourage
>
> you to report them. I'm also a committer on that project and would be keen
>
> to help with any improvements. Here's how we do it on Moviefun:
>
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/examples/moviefun/pom.xml#L111-L126
>
> .
>
>
> We're not able to translate javax -> jakarta "on the fly". I have looked at
>
> this, and theoretically its possible to create a java agent to do this, but
>
> it comes unstuck where various libraries inspect classes for annotations,
>
> and none of them actually *load* the class to do that (so it doesn't get
>
> translated, and subsequently fails). Unfortunately, the renaming means
>
> we'll all need to make changes to our applications at some point.
>
>
> Jon
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:04 PM Zowalla, Richard <
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jon,
>
>
> thanks for the explanation.
>
>
> The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven staging
>
> repository? Is this known/planned in this way?
>
>
> I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) with
>
> the 9.0.0-M2 artifacts.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore:
>
> Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message:
>
>
>
> Hi folks
>
>
> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
>
>
> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
>
> briefly address.
>
>
> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
>
> can't
>
> vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I can
>
> cancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
>
> wish.
>
> I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're producing the binary
>
> that
>
> uses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it to produce the version
>
> that
>
> uses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so going forward.
>
>
> We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you can
>
> report
>
> issues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the release. I
>
> totally understand that migrating your own projects to the jakarta
>
> namespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a vote. If
>
> you can
>
> check you can download it and boot it up, and check for any legal
>
> issues,
>
> bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an example app to try,
>
> do try
>
> building the moviefun example. That (like many of the examples)
>
> produces
>
> both javax and jakarta .war files.
>
>
> Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is fantastic.
>
> A
>
> couple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not expecting a full
>
> pass,
>
> but I'm also not expecting regressions, so passing the TCK shouldn't
>
> block
>
> the release. I did have to comment out the new security module (sorry
>
> -
>
> there were some JAX-RS test failures with it), so those tests still
>
> won't
>
> pass.
>
>
> Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may have.
>
> Many
>
> thanks again for your reviews.
>
>
> Jon
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore <
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi folks
>
>
> Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far.
>
>
> I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted to
>
> briefly address.
>
>
> The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. You
>
> can't
>
> vote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for example. I
>
> can close
>
> this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for the 2, if we
>
> wish.
>
>
> I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax
>
> (8.0.4) and
>
> then transforming it to produce the version that uses jakarta
>
> (9.0.0-M2).
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore <
>
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi All,
>
>
> I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 and
>
> Apache
>
> TomEE 8.0.4.
>
>
>
> Maven Repo:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/
>
>
> Binaries & Source:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/
>
>
> Source code:
>
> TomEE 8.0.4:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip
>
> TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip
>
>
> Tags:
>
>
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4
>
>
>
> https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2
>
>
> Release notes:
>
>
>
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12348414
>
>
> Please VOTE:
>
>
> [+1] Yes, release it
>
> [+0] Not fussed
>
> [-1] Don't release, there's a showstopper (please specify what
>
> the
>
> showstopper is)
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
>
> Here is my +1.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Jon
>
>
>
> --
>
> Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.
> Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics
>
>
>
> Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied Sciences
> Max-Planck-Str. 39
> D-74081 Heilbronn
> phone: +49 7131 504 6791
> mail: [email protected]
> web: http://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
>

Reply via email to