Thanks for the exaplantion, Jon. I will take a look at the transformer and apply it to our application after I have returned from vacation. For now: Take my +1 (although I've only tested 8.0.4 as stated in my original mail). Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 12:41 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Gallimore: > Hi Richard > The artifacts are here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/org/apache/tomee/jakarta/apache-tomee/9.0.0-M2/ > (note the org.apache.tomee.jakarta group ID). > The transformation tool currently only works on zips, which is why we > don't(yet) have tar.gzs there. > Its worth taking a look at the Eclipse Transformer to transform > yourapplications. This is another case where I'd expect issues, and > encourageyou to report them. I'm also a committer on that project and > would be keento help with any improvements. Here's how we do it on > Moviefun: > https://github.com/apache/tomee/blob/master/examples/moviefun/pom.xml#L111-L126 > . > We're not able to translate javax -> jakarta "on the fly". I have > looked atthis, and theoretically its possible to create a java agent > to do this, butit comes unstuck where various libraries inspect > classes for annotations,and none of them actually *load* the class to > do that (so it doesn't gettranslated, and subsequently fails). > Unfortunately, the renaming meanswe'll all need to make changes to > our applications at some point. > Jon > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 12:04 PM Zowalla, Richard < > richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > Hi Jon, > thanks for the explanation. > The artifacts for 9.0.0-M2 seem to be missing in the Maven > stagingrepository? Is this known/planned in this way? > I just wanted to build our project (which works fine with 8.0.4) > withthe 9.0.0-M2 artifacts. > Thanks,Richard > > Am Donnerstag, den 23.07.2020, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Jonathan > Gallimore: > Dammit, accidentally hit send far too soon. Here's the whole message: > > Hi folks > Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far. > I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted tobriefly > address. > The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. > Youcan'tvote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for > example. I cancancel this vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote > for the 2, if wewish.I didn't do this on this occasion, because we're > producing the binarythatuses javax (8.0.4) and then transforming it > to produce the versionthatuses jakarta (9.0.0-M2), but can do so > going forward. > We don't expect 9.0.0-M2 to be perfect. We're grateful if you > canreportissues you find, but that shouldn't necessarily block the > release. Itotally understand that migrating your own projects to the > jakartanamespace is a big deal and unlikely to be feasible for a > vote. Ifyou cancheck you can download it and boot it up, and check > for any legalissues,bad libraries etc, that helps. If you'd like an > example app to try,do trybuilding the moviefun example. That (like > many of the examples)producesboth javax and jakarta .war files. > Jean-Louis is going to run the TCK against this, which is > fantastic.Acouple of notes here to set expectations - I'm not > expecting a fullpass,but I'm also not expecting regressions, so > passing the TCK shouldn'tblockthe release. I did have to comment out > the new security module (sorry-there were some JAX-RS test failures > with it), so those tests stillwon'tpass. > Hope that all makes sense, but please ask any questions you may > have.Manythanks again for your reviews. > Jon > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 10:30 AM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks > Thanks for the reviews and feedback so far. > I've seen a couple of comments come in that I just wanted tobriefly > address. > The vote is TomEE 8.0.4 *and* 9.0.0-M2. A +1 is a +1 for both. > Youcan'tvote +1 for 8.0.4 and 0 (or abstain) for 9.0.0-M2, for > example. Ican closethis vote, re-roll, and issue a separate vote for > the 2, if wewish. > I didn't, because we're producing the binary that uses javax(8.0.4) > andthen transforming it to produce the version that uses > jakarta(9.0.0-M2). > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 3:34 PM Jonathan Gallimore < > jonathan.gallim...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > I am delighted to present a vote for Apache TomEE 9.0.0-M2 > andApacheTomEE 8.0.4. > > Maven Repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomee-1173/ > > Binaries & Source: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/ > > Source code:TomEE 8.0.4: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/tomee-project-8.0.4-source-release.zip > TomEE Jakarta Conversion for 9.0.0-M2: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomee/staging-1173/tomee-8.0.4/apache-tomee-9.0.0-M2-source-release.zip > > Tags: > > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-project-8.0.4 > > https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tomee-jakarta.git;a=tag;h=refs/tags/tomee-9.0.0-M2 > > Release notes: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12312320&version=12348414 > > Please VOTE: > [+1] Yes, release it[+0] Not fussed[-1] Don't release, there's a > showstopper (please specify whattheshowstopper is) > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > Here is my +1. > Thanks > Jon > -- Richard Zowalla, M.Sc.Research Associate, PhD Student | Medical Informatics
Hochschule Heilbronn – University of Applied SciencesMax-Planck-Str. 39 D-74081 Heilbronn phone: +49 7131 504 6791mail: richard.zowalla@hs-heilbronn.deweb: http://www.mi.hs-heilbronn.de/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
