I haven't had a chance to dig into the differences on the jakartaee-api jars like I did for the javaee-api jars. Is it at all possible you could create a diff like this one?
- https://gist.github.com/dblevins/7535757fb8eceb51ed30ae9b705f9cbf/revisions I basically built each, did a `jar tvf javaee-api-8.0-5.jar | cut -c 37-` and pasted that output into a gist, then did it again against the javaee-api-8.0-6.jar and updated the content in the gist. It'd be super helpful. I did look at the commits, but with maven transitive deps and such I don't really trust myself to eyeball it correctly. -David > On May 24, 2022, at 6:44 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > wrote: > > Alright, time for a new update. > > TomEE 8.x with JDK8 and EE8 is equivalent to TomEE 9.x with JDK11/JDK17 and > EE9. > The build is still not full green, but it's time to start grabbing user > feedback as we discussed. > > So the work started to take every single piece we fixed or patched to start > doing releases and if possible run TCK + signature Tests. > > David did activation and mail milestones. Richard used the milestone to fix > and we are now under vote for activation 2.0 final and Richard is making > some awesomeness on the mail spec and impl. We should be able to get final > versions soon. > > We also have an OWB vote starting today for a jakarta compatible version > (including TCK). > Next step is to release a milestone for jakartaee-api 9.1-M2 and move on. > > > > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 9:29 AM Wiesner, Martin < > martin.wies...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Best >> Martin >> — >> https://twitter.com/mawiesne >> >> >> Am 11.05.2022 um 19:00 schrieb Cesar Hernandez <cesargu...@gmail.com >> <mailto:cesargu...@gmail.com>>: >> >> +1, Thank you! >> >> >> El mié, 11 may 2022 a las 9:06, Daniel Dias Dos Santos (< >> daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com<mailto:daniel.dias.analist...@gmail.com>>) >> escribió: >> >> +1 >> >> On Wed, May 11, 2022, 12:00 Zowalla, Richard < >> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de<mailto:richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>> >> wrote: >> >> I am fine with it: +1 >> ________________________________ >> Von: Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com<mailto: >> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>> >> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2022 15:57:54 >> An: dev@tomee.apache.org<mailto:dev@tomee.apache.org> >> Betreff: Re: TomEE 9.x - from javax to jakarta namespace >> >> Alright, with the latest changes pushed yesterday and today, we are now >> at >> the exact same numbers for TomEE 8.x / Jakarta EE 8 under JDK8 and TomEE >> 9.x / Jakarta 9.1 under JDK17. >> >> If everyone is ok with it, we can create a new milestone and give users >> the >> opportunity to provide us with some feedback and to report bugs. >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:06 PM David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> Was checking out the TCK numbers this morning can make to suggest a >> 9.0.0-M8 while things look good and found this amazing email. >> >> The 9.0.x branch is looking absolutely amazing!!! >> >> What do we think about pushing out a 9.0.0-M8 while things are in their >> peak-stable state? I'm sure we'll have to rip up a few more things to >> finish off the remaining Jakarta EE and MP TCK issues. Would be great >> to >> have something that isn't M7 to fallback on as a reference point to >> track >> regressions. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> >> -David >> >> >> >> On May 10, 2022, at 3:56 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < >> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com<mailto:jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Time for some reporting.... >> >> On our journey to migrate TomEE over from javax to jakarta namespace, >> we >> had many issues. >> After updating all our code, we had to do a bunch of dependency >> upgrades >> after upgrading many of them (OpenWebbeans, BVal, Geronimo, etc). >> >> We then faced many issues with non compatible libraries for example >> (ActiveMQ, commons-dbcp, CXF, sxc, taglib, etc). So we ended up >> repacking >> them in our own groupId after using the Maven Shade plugin to >> relocate >> the >> packages. >> >> We worked on BVal TCK and CDI TCK and we are close to passing them. >> >> But we had before to solve all our outdated MicroProfile 1.3 stack to >> the >> most recent and jakarta compatible version. Geronimo implementations >> being >> far being, we decided to use some SmallRye implementations until we >> can >> dedicate some time to update our Apache implementations (config, >> metrics, >> health, openapi, opentracing, fault tolerance). >> >> Our build is now more stable, but still not green. Some issues are >> basically easy to fix and most people could do it (examples for >> instance). >> >> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-full/ >> >> The integration for openapi, opentracing and fault tolerance is not >> done >> and we are far from passing the TCK. On config, metrics and health we >> are >> close. Same for our JWT implementation. >> >> I also wanted to have a view on the platform TCK, so I decided to >> stop >> TomEE work in order to spend time on the Platform TCK to do all >> dependency >> upgrades and get the TCK to run properly. I'm pleased to announce >> that >> after 2 weeks of hard work, we are 99% compatible >> >> https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1652104572445 >> >> Thanks everyone for the help. >> Keep going and if you need some guidance or help, let us know. >> >> For coordination purposes, here is the issue >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3862 >> Many subtasks are there and you can create new tasks when needed and >> ask >> any committer to assign it to you. >> >> >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 11:13 AM Zowalla, Richard < >> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de> wrote: >> >> Yes - we already yanked it in 9.x >> >> Gruß >> Richard >> >> Am Donnerstag, dem 05.05.2022 um 10:10 +0100 schrieb Jonathan >> Gallimore: >> Sounds good. I'll drop the transformer from the 8.x branch (looks >> like we >> don't use it in 9.x), and I'll create a single example to >> demonstrate >> it in >> a sandbox. >> >> Jon >> >> On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:32 PM Zowalla, Richard < >> richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de<mailto:richard.zowa...@hs-heilbronn.de>> >> wrote: >> >> You are right - we can remove it imho from 8.x as we do not test >> with >> it and the transformed samples might not even work, e.g. >> dependencies >> are not migrated, etc. >> >> +1 for providing a (bigger) example. >> >> Gruß >> Richard >> >> Am Mittwoch, dem 04.05.2022 um 11:17 +0100 schrieb Jonathan >> Gallimore: >> I've picked up a task related to the examples: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3873. I specifically >> went >> for >> this, as I added the Eclipse Transformer to the build for a >> number of >> examples in the past, back when we were doing the transformation >> process on >> TomEE itself. The drawbacks here is that any tests in the >> examples >> run on >> the javax code, and we just "assume" that the transformed >> artifact >> works. I >> would suggest removing that for the master build, as it just >> takes >> build >> time, and the examples should be transformed from javax to >> jakarta at >> source (if they aren't already). On the TomEE 8 build, we could >> select a >> few examples (no need to do them all) and find a way to run the >> tests >> on >> both javax and jakarta versions of TomEE. >> >> Additionally, it would likely be useful to add documentation to >> this. >> If we >> also wanted a bigger example application that specifically covers >> transformation, I could look at that too. >> >> What do you think? >> >> Jon >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:58 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < >> jlmonte...@tomitribe.com<mailto:jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I've been working for quite a long time on TomEE 9.x, and it's >> been >> more >> challenging and painful than I was expecting. I thought it >> would be >> good to >> give you some sort of status. >> >> I created a PR for the work. As a reminder, since Java EE moved >> to >> Eclipse >> to become Jakarta EE, we had a switch from javax.* namespace to >> jakarta.* >> namespace. This is an impacting change, since all applications >> and >> applications servers are built on top of it. >> >> In TomEE, we decided to do that change in TomEE. We had >> previously >> a >> bytecode change approach like an application could do. It >> worked >> and we >> were able to get certified. But it had a lot of limitations, so >> we >> had to >> do the migration in the code and fix all compatibility issues. >> >> Here is the PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/814 >> It has 90+ commits and nearly 5000 files touched (added, >> removed, >> updated). >> I understand it's a lot and it makes it almost impossible to >> review. But I >> did not see much approaches in this scenario to create smaller >> PRs. >> >> I created a Jenkins build though available at >> >> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-quick-9.x/ >> >> It makes it possible to track the progress. There have been >> steps >> forward >> and steps backward. >> >> All the code does not sit under TomEE, we use a bunch of third >> party >> projects and libraries. I have been able to contribute, publish >> jakarta >> compatible versions and get releases for some of them (Jakarta >> EE >> APIs Uber >> jar, Geronimo Connectors and Transaction Manager, Geronimo >> Config, >> Health, >> Metrics, OpenTracing, OpenAPI. OpenJPA, BVal, and OpenWebBeans >> will >> be >> released soon. >> >> The big parts is CXF, and ActiveMQ. I had to get them done in >> TomEE >> and >> update all group/artifact ids. It's under deps, alongside with >> SXC, >> DBCP, >> and others. >> >> In terms of removal, I tried to remove old stuff like SAAJ Axis >> 1 >> integration, JAX RPC, Management J2EE and a couple of other old >> things. >> >> A lot of other libraries got updated to their latest version >> when >> available >> in the new jakarta namespace. >> >> I'm starting to get all the build stable and many modules are >> passing now, >> including all CXF webservices, OpenEJB Core, and others. I can >> get >> a build >> and run TomEE. >> >> Goal is to get a green build asap so we can start working on >> TCK. >> The "quick" build is now green. Working on the full build. >> >> I'll soon be creating a branch for TomEE 8.x maintenance and >> merge >> the PR. >> I'm hoping we can then have small PRs or at least more people >> working in >> parallel. >> >> -- >> Jean-Louis Monteiro >> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Atentamente: >> César Hernández. >> >>
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
