Here it is https://gist.github.com/jeanouii/9bb6c14bdde227e2fed83fd73db3a646/revisions
-- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 1:10 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < [email protected]> wrote: > Ah ok, thanks, it wasn't clear :-) > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 1:09 PM Zowalla, Richard < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Guess it is: >> >> jakarataee-api-9.1-M2-SNAPSHOT-tomcat.jar vs jakarataee-api-9.1-M1- >> tomcat.jar >> >> (similar to javaee-api differences in the gist) >> >> >> Am Mittwoch, dem 25.05.2022 um 12:21 +0200 schrieb Jean-Louis Monteiro: >> > Hey David, >> > >> > Does not seem to be undoable. >> > >> > Just a quick question: do you want the diff between jakartaee-api and >> > javaee-api or do you want diff between every version of the >> > jakartaee-api? >> > >> > -- >> > Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > >> > >> > On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 2:44 AM David Blevins < >> > [email protected]> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > I haven't had a chance to dig into the differences on the >> > > jakartaee-api >> > > jars like I did for the javaee-api jars. Is it at all possible you >> > > could >> > > create a diff like this one? >> > > >> > > - >> > > >> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/7535757fb8eceb51ed30ae9b705f9cbf/revisions >> > > >> > > I basically built each, did a `jar tvf javaee-api-8.0-5.jar | cut >> > > -c 37-` >> > > and pasted that output into a gist, then did it again against the >> > > javaee-api-8.0-6.jar and updated the content in the gist. >> > > >> > > It'd be super helpful. >> > > >> > > I did look at the commits, but with maven transitive deps and such >> > > I don't >> > > really trust myself to eyeball it correctly. >> > > >> > > >> > > -David >> > > >> > > >> > > > On May 24, 2022, at 6:44 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < >> > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > Alright, time for a new update. >> > > > >> > > > TomEE 8.x with JDK8 and EE8 is equivalent to TomEE 9.x with >> > > > JDK11/JDK17 >> > > and >> > > > EE9. >> > > > The build is still not full green, but it's time to start >> > > > grabbing user >> > > > feedback as we discussed. >> > > > >> > > > So the work started to take every single piece we fixed or >> > > > patched to >> > > start >> > > > doing releases and if possible run TCK + signature Tests. >> > > > >> > > > David did activation and mail milestones. Richard used the >> > > > milestone to >> > > fix >> > > > and we are now under vote for activation 2.0 final and Richard is >> > > > making >> > > > some awesomeness on the mail spec and impl. We should be able to >> > > > get >> > > final >> > > > versions soon. >> > > > >> > > > We also have an OWB vote starting today for a jakarta compatible >> > > > version >> > > > (including TCK). >> > > > Next step is to release a milestone for jakartaee-api 9.1-M2 and >> > > > move on. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > > > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 9:29 AM Wiesner, Martin < >> > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > Best >> > > > > Martin >> > > > > — >> > > > > https://twitter.com/mawiesne >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Am 11.05.2022 um 19:00 schrieb Cesar Hernandez < >> > > > > [email protected] >> > > > > <mailto:[email protected]>>: >> > > > > >> > > > > +1, Thank you! >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > El mié, 11 may 2022 a las 9:06, Daniel Dias Dos Santos (< >> > > > > [email protected]<mailto: >> > > [email protected]>>) >> > > > > escribió: >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, May 11, 2022, 12:00 Zowalla, Richard < >> > > > > [email protected]<mailto: >> > > > > [email protected] >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > I am fine with it: +1 >> > > > > ________________________________ >> > > > > Von: Jean-Louis Monteiro <[email protected]<mailto: >> > > > > [email protected]>> >> > > > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. Mai 2022 15:57:54 >> > > > > An: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >> > > > > Betreff: Re: TomEE 9.x - from javax to jakarta namespace >> > > > > >> > > > > Alright, with the latest changes pushed yesterday and today, we >> > > > > are now >> > > > > at >> > > > > the exact same numbers for TomEE 8.x / Jakarta EE 8 under JDK8 >> > > > > and TomEE >> > > > > 9.x / Jakarta 9.1 under JDK17. >> > > > > >> > > > > If everyone is ok with it, we can create a new milestone and >> > > > > give users >> > > > > the >> > > > > opportunity to provide us with some feedback and to report >> > > > > bugs. >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:06 PM David Blevins < >> > > > > [email protected]> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Was checking out the TCK numbers this morning can make to >> > > > > suggest a >> > > > > 9.0.0-M8 while things look good and found this amazing email. >> > > > > >> > > > > The 9.0.x branch is looking absolutely amazing!!! >> > > > > >> > > > > What do we think about pushing out a 9.0.0-M8 while things are >> > > > > in their >> > > > > peak-stable state? I'm sure we'll have to rip up a few more >> > > > > things to >> > > > > finish off the remaining Jakarta EE and MP TCK issues. Would >> > > > > be great >> > > > > to >> > > > > have something that isn't M7 to fallback on as a reference >> > > > > point to >> > > > > track >> > > > > regressions. >> > > > > >> > > > > Thoughts? >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -David >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On May 10, 2022, at 3:56 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro < >> > > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi all, >> > > > > >> > > > > Time for some reporting.... >> > > > > >> > > > > On our journey to migrate TomEE over from javax to jakarta >> > > > > namespace, >> > > > > we >> > > > > had many issues. >> > > > > After updating all our code, we had to do a bunch of dependency >> > > > > upgrades >> > > > > after upgrading many of them (OpenWebbeans, BVal, Geronimo, >> > > > > etc). >> > > > > >> > > > > We then faced many issues with non compatible libraries for >> > > > > example >> > > > > (ActiveMQ, commons-dbcp, CXF, sxc, taglib, etc). So we ended up >> > > > > repacking >> > > > > them in our own groupId after using the Maven Shade plugin to >> > > > > relocate >> > > > > the >> > > > > packages. >> > > > > >> > > > > We worked on BVal TCK and CDI TCK and we are close to passing >> > > > > them. >> > > > > >> > > > > But we had before to solve all our outdated MicroProfile 1.3 >> > > > > stack to >> > > > > the >> > > > > most recent and jakarta compatible version. Geronimo >> > > > > implementations >> > > > > being >> > > > > far being, we decided to use some SmallRye implementations >> > > > > until we >> > > > > can >> > > > > dedicate some time to update our Apache implementations >> > > > > (config, >> > > > > metrics, >> > > > > health, openapi, opentracing, fault tolerance). >> > > > > >> > > > > Our build is now more stable, but still not green. Some issues >> > > > > are >> > > > > basically easy to fix and most people could do it (examples for >> > > > > instance). >> > > > > >> > > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-full/ >> > > > > >> > > > > The integration for openapi, opentracing and fault tolerance is >> > > > > not >> > > > > done >> > > > > and we are far from passing the TCK. On config, metrics and >> > > > > health we >> > > > > are >> > > > > close. Same for our JWT implementation. >> > > > > >> > > > > I also wanted to have a view on the platform TCK, so I decided >> > > > > to >> > > > > stop >> > > > > TomEE work in order to spend time on the Platform TCK to do all >> > > > > dependency >> > > > > upgrades and get the TCK to run properly. I'm pleased to >> > > > > announce >> > > > > that >> > > > > after 2 weeks of hard work, we are 99% compatible >> > > > > >> > > > > https://tck.work/tomee/build?id=1652104572445 >> > > > > >> > > > > Thanks everyone for the help. >> > > > > Keep going and if you need some guidance or help, let us know. >> > > > > >> > > > > For coordination purposes, here is the issue >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3862 >> > > > > Many subtasks are there and you can create new tasks when >> > > > > needed and >> > > > > ask >> > > > > any committer to assign it to you. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Thu, May 5, 2022 at 11:13 AM Zowalla, Richard < >> > > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Yes - we already yanked it in 9.x >> > > > > >> > > > > Gruß >> > > > > Richard >> > > > > >> > > > > Am Donnerstag, dem 05.05.2022 um 10:10 +0100 schrieb Jonathan >> > > > > Gallimore: >> > > > > Sounds good. I'll drop the transformer from the 8.x branch >> > > > > (looks >> > > > > like we >> > > > > don't use it in 9.x), and I'll create a single example to >> > > > > demonstrate >> > > > > it in >> > > > > a sandbox. >> > > > > >> > > > > Jon >> > > > > >> > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 12:32 PM Zowalla, Richard < >> > > > > [email protected]<mailto: >> > > > > [email protected] >> > > > > >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > You are right - we can remove it imho from 8.x as we do not >> > > > > test >> > > > > with >> > > > > it and the transformed samples might not even work, e.g. >> > > > > dependencies >> > > > > are not migrated, etc. >> > > > > >> > > > > +1 for providing a (bigger) example. >> > > > > >> > > > > Gruß >> > > > > Richard >> > > > > >> > > > > Am Mittwoch, dem 04.05.2022 um 11:17 +0100 schrieb Jonathan >> > > > > Gallimore: >> > > > > I've picked up a task related to the examples: >> > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-3873. I >> > > > > specifically >> > > > > went >> > > > > for >> > > > > this, as I added the Eclipse Transformer to the build for a >> > > > > number of >> > > > > examples in the past, back when we were doing the >> > > > > transformation >> > > > > process on >> > > > > TomEE itself. The drawbacks here is that any tests in the >> > > > > examples >> > > > > run on >> > > > > the javax code, and we just "assume" that the transformed >> > > > > artifact >> > > > > works. I >> > > > > would suggest removing that for the master build, as it just >> > > > > takes >> > > > > build >> > > > > time, and the examples should be transformed from javax to >> > > > > jakarta at >> > > > > source (if they aren't already). On the TomEE 8 build, we could >> > > > > select a >> > > > > few examples (no need to do them all) and find a way to run the >> > > > > tests >> > > > > on >> > > > > both javax and jakarta versions of TomEE. >> > > > > >> > > > > Additionally, it would likely be useful to add documentation to >> > > > > this. >> > > > > If we >> > > > > also wanted a bigger example application that specifically >> > > > > covers >> > > > > transformation, I could look at that too. >> > > > > >> > > > > What do you think? >> > > > > >> > > > > Jon >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 12:58 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro < >> > > > > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >> > > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > I've been working for quite a long time on TomEE 9.x, and it's >> > > > > been >> > > > > more >> > > > > challenging and painful than I was expecting. I thought it >> > > > > would be >> > > > > good to >> > > > > give you some sort of status. >> > > > > >> > > > > I created a PR for the work. As a reminder, since Java EE moved >> > > > > to >> > > > > Eclipse >> > > > > to become Jakarta EE, we had a switch from javax.* namespace to >> > > > > jakarta.* >> > > > > namespace. This is an impacting change, since all applications >> > > > > and >> > > > > applications servers are built on top of it. >> > > > > >> > > > > In TomEE, we decided to do that change in TomEE. We had >> > > > > previously >> > > > > a >> > > > > bytecode change approach like an application could do. It >> > > > > worked >> > > > > and we >> > > > > were able to get certified. But it had a lot of limitations, so >> > > > > we >> > > > > had to >> > > > > do the migration in the code and fix all compatibility issues. >> > > > > >> > > > > Here is the PR https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/814 >> > > > > It has 90+ commits and nearly 5000 files touched (added, >> > > > > removed, >> > > > > updated). >> > > > > I understand it's a lot and it makes it almost impossible to >> > > > > review. But I >> > > > > did not see much approaches in this scenario to create smaller >> > > > > PRs. >> > > > > >> > > > > I created a Jenkins build though available at >> > > > > >> > > > > >> https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/master-build-quick-9.x/ >> > > > > >> > > > > It makes it possible to track the progress. There have been >> > > > > steps >> > > > > forward >> > > > > and steps backward. >> > > > > >> > > > > All the code does not sit under TomEE, we use a bunch of third >> > > > > party >> > > > > projects and libraries. I have been able to contribute, publish >> > > > > jakarta >> > > > > compatible versions and get releases for some of them (Jakarta >> > > > > EE >> > > > > APIs Uber >> > > > > jar, Geronimo Connectors and Transaction Manager, Geronimo >> > > > > Config, >> > > > > Health, >> > > > > Metrics, OpenTracing, OpenAPI. OpenJPA, BVal, and OpenWebBeans >> > > > > will >> > > > > be >> > > > > released soon. >> > > > > >> > > > > The big parts is CXF, and ActiveMQ. I had to get them done in >> > > > > TomEE >> > > > > and >> > > > > update all group/artifact ids. It's under deps, alongside with >> > > > > SXC, >> > > > > DBCP, >> > > > > and others. >> > > > > >> > > > > In terms of removal, I tried to remove old stuff like SAAJ Axis >> > > > > 1 >> > > > > integration, JAX RPC, Management J2EE and a couple of other old >> > > > > things. >> > > > > >> > > > > A lot of other libraries got updated to their latest version >> > > > > when >> > > > > available >> > > > > in the new jakarta namespace. >> > > > > >> > > > > I'm starting to get all the build stable and many modules are >> > > > > passing now, >> > > > > including all CXF webservices, OpenEJB Core, and others. I can >> > > > > get >> > > > > a build >> > > > > and run TomEE. >> > > > > >> > > > > Goal is to get a green build asap so we can start working on >> > > > > TCK. >> > > > > The "quick" build is now green. Working on the full build. >> > > > > >> > > > > I'll soon be creating a branch for TomEE 8.x maintenance and >> > > > > merge >> > > > > the PR. >> > > > > I'm hoping we can then have small PRs or at least more people >> > > > > working in >> > > > > parallel. >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro >> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro >> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- >> > > > > Atentamente: >> > > > > César Hernández. >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >
