After some more digging:
com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs.ee.rs.core.headers.JAXRSClient#getDateTest_from_
standalone
com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs.ee.rs.client.clientrequestcontext.JAXRSClient#ge
tHeadersIsMutableTest_from_standalone
are failing on the TCK / AWS environment due to an old version of the
JDK (11.0.10). The background is, that CXF 4.0.2 introduced a new
conduit and forces the usage of the default http client of the jdk.
As the TCK sends a "Date" header, which counts as restriced in older
JDK versions, the tests fail. In recent JDK versions (>11.0.14), the
restrictions were opened and the "Date" header isn't restricted
anymore.
So if those tests are run with a newer JDK version, they are passing.
So we are done to 2 failures:
com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs.ee.rs.core.headers.JAXRSClient getLengthTest_
from_standalone FAILED
com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs.spec.provider.standardnotnull.JAXRSClient
clientDataSourceProviderTest_from_standalone FAILED
The branch is on the TomEE repo here: [3].
I will try to look at those tests in the next days but any additional
thoughts on them are warmly welcome ;)
Gruß
Richard
[1]
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk11u/commit/86cd9ba29d329a8fa310709c443e53e94888a517
[2]
https://github.com/apache/cxf/commit/9b36a4bc996615e0ed02795c74167586a2bb11df
[3] https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/cxf4
Am Freitag, dem 18.08.2023 um 14:59 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> Jon triggered a run on tck.work for that branch [1] (thx!!) and we
> have
> only 4 regressions from the upgrade.
>
> Will have a look into those failures and see, if I can find out
> something useful.
>
>
> [1]
> https://tck.work/tomee/tests?path=com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs&build=1692359054645&status=FAILED
>
>
> Am Freitag, dem 18.08.2023 um 11:47 +0200 schrieb Richard Zowalla:
> > Now I actually also ran my local setup again with 9.1.1-SNAPSHOT
> > which
> > we know passes the TCK for EE 9.1.
> >
> > The result is: 2708 | 95
> >
> > This suggests that my local setup is a bit wonky as the same tests
> > are
> > failing ;)
> >
> > It would be great if someone could take my CXF4 branch and run the
> > EE
> > 9.1 TCK against it once.
> >
> > Gruß
> > Richard
> >
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 17.08.2023 um 17:29 +0200 schrieb Richard
> > Zowalla:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I've been doing some work to get rid of our cxf-shade and
> > > > migrate
> > > > to
> > > > cxf 4.0.2. The branch is here: [1].
> > > >
> > > > Our own build is in progess and I expect some failures due to
> > > > missed
> > > > dependencies in test setups: [2]
> > > >
> > > > I did run the jaxrs part of the TCK (ee91) against my branch
> > > > locally
> > > > and it looks promising but (as expected) we have some TCK
> > > > regressions
> > > > (*meh*):
> > > >
> > > > Completed running 2803 tests (1:34:15.098):
> > > >
> > > > Passed: 2706
> > > > Failed: 97
> > > > Errors: 0
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In the past, my local tck setup sometimes failed for tests,
> > > > which
> > > > >
> > > > were
> > > > ok on other systems. Maybe someone can confirm, that these
> > > > tests
> > > > are
> > > > actually failing for them too? Here is my list: [3]
> > > >
> > > > For reference I did run
> > > >
> > > > rm -rf target/ && ./runtests -Dhttps.protocols=TLSv1.1,TLSv1.2
> > > > --
> > > > ee91 > -
> > > > j --env -nc -c -w tomee-plume com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs
> > > >
> > > > Any feedback welcome.
> > > >
> > > > Gruß
> > > > Richard
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/rzo1/tomee/tree/cxf4
> > > > [2]
> > > > https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Tomee/job/pull-request-manual/15
> > > > [3]
> > > > https://gist.github.com/rzo1/efbfbf568e7101842d3ffab2fdb38a3b
> >
>
