Hi there!

I think the real root cause is that the definitions of what can be done on which codeline is currently often not done early enough. As soon as a new target is being created for the bugtracking system the corresponding rules should be configured in EIS also. If that would be the case we wouldn´t have any annoyance either. If that doesn´t work somebody just has to complain to the group of people which have been assigned to do these administrative tasks and that is "program management".

Doing such test only when the cws is being set to "ready for QA" just because some developers don´t like to see the color red is IMHO not the right solution. On the contrary I would argue that maybe even setting the CWS to "ready for QA" shouldn´t be allowed at all if there are tasks with the wrong target.


Kind regards,
Bernd Eilers


Mathias Bauer wrote:
Hi,

ACK.

If we think that we need that bullshit, the status should at least not be set to "failed" before the CWS is ready for QA. That still would be bureaucratic humbug (because both fields are that per se), but at least some humbug that is less annoying.

Regards,
Mathias

On 18.06.2010 12:06, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
What a heap of bureaucratic humbug.

-Stephan

On 06/18/10 11:43, Bernd Eilers wrote:

Hi Stephan!

There is no "error" in EIS, EIS behaves just as it was instructed to do.

If you click on the "Details" link you will find the following
information:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The release of this ChildWorkspace is OOo 3.4 . The release of the CWS
is invalid.

The allowed Releases for the MasterWorkspace of this CWS are: OOo 3.1
, OOo 3.2 , OOo 3.1.1 , OOo 3.3 , OOo 3.2.1

The List of allowed Releases for MasterWorkspaces is being maintained
by program management.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

This all basically means that if you think OOo 3.4 should be in the
list for that MasterWorkspace but isn´t ask your friendly program
manager next door to add it.

Kind regards,
Bernd Eilers


Stephan Bergmann wrote:
For a CWS based on DEV300 with release set to OOo 3.4 and all
associated tasks having target OOo 3.4, AllowedRelease and
AllowedTaskTargets erroneously are both set to failed (e.g., see
<http://eis.services.openoffice.org/EIS2/cws.ShowCWS?Id=9434&OpenOnly=false&Section=All>).


-Stephan

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tools.openoffice.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@tools.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@tools.openoffice.org

Reply via email to