> Again, this is a false statement. Every statement I have made in this thread is true to the best of my knowledge.
> @RobButts would you be willing to let us I am one individual, I have not voted -1 on this, and I have not in any way suggested I will single-handedly push my agenda here against the consensus of the community. If anyone believed otherwise, I apologize, that was never my intent. I retract my previous comments, and recuse myself from the discussion and decision on this thread. On Thu, Sep 9, 2021 at 5:04 PM Rawlin Peters <raw...@apache.org> wrote: > > Not to keep the can of worms open, but could a happy medium an > alternative here be to add a new section to our API responses at the same > level as "response" that we could add new/breaking stuff to in the current > API version? > > That is an interesting idea, but I think that would make the API more > complex overall and wouldn't actually save us from a new major version > in the long-run once we move the "unstable" section to the "response" > section. Letting TO API 4.0 remain unstable for another release cycle > allows us to keep the API simple (and make it simpler, really) while > also not introducing a new major API version. > > @RobButts would you be willing to let us keep TO API 4.0 unstable for > this upcoming release cycle and decide after if we should try it again > in the future? > > - Rawlin >
