We have delivered 2 major releases, this is significant progress for Trafodion, 
I would like to have +1.

Br,

Seth

-----Original Message-----
From: Yang, Yang (Felix) [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: 2016年6月14日 9:38
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Tradofion TLP (top level project) status

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: Gunnar Tapper [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 8:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tradofion TLP (top level project) status

+1

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:39 PM, Roberta Marton <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks for all your replies.
> The basic feeling I see is:
> "Trafodion is actively working on getting new non Esgyn committers but 
> to get people's interest and get them to follow with contributions is tough."
>
> But this doesn't indicate whether we should or should not try for TLP.
> Let's make it more simple:
>
> +1 = discussion over - go for TLP at this time
>   0 = not sure, discuss some more
> -1 = wait until we get more non Esgyn committers or at least until we 
> get more contributors that have the potential to be committers.
>
> Something to keep in mind, even if we decide to go for TLP, we might 
> get turned down by the IPMC.
> To get a feel for IPMC's thoughts,  our mentor Stack sent out a 
> message to the general incubator list with the following request
>
> "We'd like to solicit feedback on whether the Trafodiion project is 
> ready to go TLP. I am the project Champion writing on behalf of the 
> project PMC.
>
> Our clutch report is nice and healthy [2]. Our up-to-date status page 
> can be found here [1.]. Development is brisk. We've made two releases 
> out of incubator up to this (with another up for vote). We have taken 
> on new committers since we entered incubation about a year ago.
>
> The main downside that we see is that we have few users -- going by 
> traffic up on the mailing list -- and that near all committers are 
> from a single company, Esgyn (Three committers are not Esgyn employees)."
>
> There we a few replies, many of them requesting more details.  However 
> there was one from John Ament ->
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201606.mbox
> /%3CCAOqetn-Gm%2BDWZ3PTXtV3wk9npiGxz0AX3q%2BpbkLkRvpYT_kuyw%40mail.gma
> il.com%3E
>
> "I think my concern is around community growth based on what's being 
> described.  I can understand the company focusing on this technology, 
> but we want a diverse community.  If there are any up coming 
> committers who are not company employees that would be great to see.
> Otherwise there's high reliance on salaried employees still.
>
> John"
>
>    Roberta
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Carol Pearson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 3:14 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tradofion TLP (top level project) status
>
> Hi,
>
> I look forward to the discussion on the general list - I hope we get 
> some great feedback from that, including specific guidance if someone 
> thinks we're not ready. If you don't try... you don't know....
>
> --Carol P.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Email:    [email protected]
> Twitter:  @CarolP222
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Gunnar Tapper 
> <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > IMO, this project is ready for TLP application.
> >
> > As a matter of fact, I suspect that TLP will help attract 
> > contributors spanning from users to coders and all other forms of 
> > contributors.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gunnar
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:37 PM, Dave Birdsall 
> > <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Regarding getting more contributors:
> > >
> > > Seems like there are two issues. One is overcoming the learning 
> > > curve of contributing, as you mentioned; the other is finding 
> > > people who would be motivated to contribute to this particular project.
> > >
> > > I think we can address the first with more tutorials on our web 
> > > site
> > and/or
> > > wiki. Already there is an excellent tutorial on UDFs. Contributing 
> > > in the engine is a more complicated endeavor, but perhaps with 
> > > appropriate internal documentation and descriptions of debugging 
> > > tools we can lower the bar.
> > >
> > > The second issue is more difficult. There are many ways to 
> > > contribute, of course. UDFs has been mentioned in the past.
> > > Perhaps we can cultivate a culture of users contributing some of 
> > > their more interesting UDFs.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Roberta Marton [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 7, 2016 3:31 PM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Tradofion TLP (top level project) status
> > >
> > > We entered Apache Incubation May  24, 2015 so we have been 
> > > incubating for about a year.
> > >
> > > We have completed 2 major releases and there is a patch release in 
> > > progress.
> > >
> > > Once the patch release completes,  we support:
> > >
> > > -          Source tar files
> > >
> > > -          Binary tar files
> > >
> > > -          Distribution support for vanilla Apache, Hortonworks, and
> > > Cloudera
> > >
> > > -          Apache web site and wiki
> > >
> > > -          Up to date documentation
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > With the patch release, we believe all licensing issues have been 
> > > addressed.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > So the next decision is whether we should apply for top level 
> > > project status.
> > >
> > > The Trafodion PMC discussed this topic and the impression is that
> > Trafodion
> > > is doing well in many aspects - it has a large community, gets a 
> > > lot of contributions (code, documentation, testing, etc.) and has 
> > > a vibrant conversation going on in the email lists, particularly 
> > > on the development side. The main problem is that still too many 
> > > folks are working for the same company, Esgyn. So, in terms of raw 
> > > numbers we are good, but we might not be diverse enough as 
> > > measured by number of independent organizations.
> > >
> > > What does everyone in the dev group think?  If we have to increase 
> > > our diversity, how can this be done? Given the complexity of 
> > > Trafodion it is not easy for a new contributor to become a 
> > > committer without a lengthy
> > learning
> > > curve.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >       Roberta
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Gunnar
> > *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
> >
>



--
Thanks,

Gunnar
*If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*

Reply via email to