@Ant: Good points. The important thing now is to have a stable structure and throughout the time we can populate it with more things. Is it ok opening a JIRA for this so that we don't forget about the categories you pointed out? I would keep this in mind as final adjustments before the release (there are also samples that currently don't work - e.g. helloworld-js-client - so we might have to take a quick look at all of them).
@Simon: Regarding the calculator sample, I don't know the exact content of it. You guys are probably better suited to take this decision. Regarding the osgi samples, I personally wouldn't go into much deeper fragmentation at the root level of the samples/ folder, but I can see it as a special subfolder of sca-features/ (like webapps/ for getting-started/). But I also don't know what the osgi integration consists of.. (implementations, bindings?) On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Simon Laws <simonsl...@googlemail.com>wrote: > Looks good to me Florian. A couple of comments in-line... > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 5:19 PM, Florian MOGA <moga....@gmail.com> wrote: > > If I understand correctly, that makes the webapps folder a subcategory of > > getting-started. > > Just to sum it up, the new structure will be something like: > > + getting-started/ > > > > - helloworld-* > > + webapps > > > > - helloworld-* > > > > + running-tuscany > > > > - launcher-* > > > > + sca-features > > > > - implementation-* > > - binding-* > > > > + applications > > > > - store-* > > - calculator-* > > Not sure that calculator should be part of the applications group. > It's a simple application that's used to demonstrate the various > features but not that interesting in it's own right. > > > > > Where do the dosgi-* samples fit in (sca-features of applications)? What > > about the logging-scribe sample? > > I think we should probably have a directory specifically for > osgi-integration in it's various forms > > > This looks like a really intuitive structure, also not too much > > fragmentation but enough to make a clean separation. Are we considering > > promoting some itests to samples? There are some really good callback-api > > samples (that's what i've checked out some time ago) in the itest folder. > > > > > > +1 > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
