> > >> - why the appearance of transitive dependencies in projects that >> depend on the aggregate jar is the shade plugin's fault. Surely this >> is our fault for not marking the dependency on the base pom as >> optional in the aggregate jar pom. >> > > I may be missing what you're suggesting but if they're optional or > provided then they wont get included in the aggregate jar which isn't > what we want. > > ...ant >
Is that really true for optional dependencies? Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
