+1. I'm all for this approach. Thanks, Raymond ________________________________________________________________ Raymond Feng rf...@apache.org Apache Tuscany PMC member and committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com ________________________________________________________________
On Apr 5, 2011, at 9:45 AM, Simon Nash wrote: > Following on from the discussion in [1], I'd like to establish > whether or not the Tuscany developer community agrees that we > should have some minimum standards for a sample to be part of trunk > and be delivered in a released binary distribution. > > If there's agreement that we should establish this principle and > have some minimum standards, I'll start another discussion thread > on what those minimum standards should be. > > I am +1 that we should have some minimum standards for a sample to be > in trunk and to be released as part of the binary distribution. > > Simon > > [1] > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/tuscany-dev/201104.mbox/%3c4d9b41c8.50...@apache.org%3E >
