Hello Kay,
I've added some more exceptions for the JRE checkbox as Linux x86-64 RPM
and Solaris x86/Sparc is only available with JRE and Linux HPPA, S390X,
PPC, IA64 and SDK only without JRE. The "index.html" includes the global
"download.js", therefore it applies also to the test section.
So, when the browser tells, e.g., OS=Solaris, then always a download
link with wJRE builds should be offered, regardless if the checkbox is
checked or not. Linux 32/64 Debian always without JRE. And so on.
The label text for the checkbox is updated.
Best regards
Marcus
Kay Schenk wrote:
Hi--a quick update on this.
I am making progress but NOT QUITE THERE yet! :(
This is one of those cart before the horse issues (things changed later
in the page but how to propagate them up), and well, some solved but ONE
problem still remaining -- a function call to openItem that needs a URL
fix. The inline ones I got to mess with through some JS.
my test area is at --
http://download.openoffice.org/test/index_k.html
more later...
On 05/20/2010 04:10 PM, Marcus Lange wrote:
Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Bernhard,
Could you divide the light green area in two areas? The upper in
darker green (like the lower border of the upper area) and only the
lower in light green.
I don't know if I hit the colors but the areas are now divided.
People intending to download directly will notice hover effect only if
they are over the main download area, while clicking on the
with/without JRE area will just toggle the checkmark.
This would help to understand the different purposes of the two parts
actually combined in the light green area.
Yes, the different events/actions need different areas. But, hm, do you
really want to have 3 green areas? OK, here you are. :-)
PS: With a smaller window the new text is wrapped sub-optimal IMHO...
Fixed with the checkbox code inside a <p> section.
(and the background images for hover are visible below the normal
ones...)
If this is not reproducible with your browser and about 800px window
width (look at RC and dev-OOo downloads), I'll upload a screenshot
(SeaMonkey 2.0.4, Firefox 3.6.3)
This looks indeed quite ugly. Needs to be fixed (by an CSS expert).
Best regards
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
