On 06/16/2010 04:07 PM, Marcus Lange wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: > > Hello Kay, > >> I'm actually working on this today, so good to know... > > I've done a cvs update and have seen your 2 files in the test section. > So, I thought about to notify you. ;-) > >> and, by the way, I need to track down who "mla" is...is that you? > > Yes, (M)arcus (La)nge. > >> I notice this page... >> >> http://download.openoffice.org/other.html#tested-full >> >> uh...has changed quite a bit and now "Download" is substituted in many >> cases for the version number. Was this on purpose? > > "Download" is to indicate the most current version and everything older > is named by its version number. This is done since a few 3.x releases.
oh gee...I guess I never noticed > >> Also, with the testing I'm doing, if I disable javascript, the checkbox >> goes away (well that's OK). >> >> But I will also point out the instructions just won't work at all if the >> chekcbox is NOT available/showing.It is virtually impossible to take out >> the "-wJRE" on the fly. At this point, the link has already been >> generated. So, maybe these instructions need to be changed? >> Or...something else. > > The checkbox is generated with JavaSript. So, no JS --> no checkbox. > > But with JS enabled IMHO it should be possible to exchange the link > because it's already working on the "other.html" and "all_rc.html" > webpages. well no...not exactly, because again the link is already generated...I mean if you just click on it. You CAN right click and do a "save link as..." and change it however, at least with Firefox. I will check using some other browsers and may change this instruction. > >> But anyway, thanks for the info...this is indeed an interesting problem >> to say the least. > > Yeah, seems to be really tricky. If my knowledge about JS would be > better I could be of better help. ;-( well OK...thanks anyway, and very sorry about the previous top posting...more fun tomorrow. > > Good night. > > Marcus > > > >> On 06/16/2010 01:04 PM, Marcus Lange wrote: >>> Hello Kay, >>> >>> I've added some more exceptions for the JRE checkbox as Linux x86-64 RPM >>> and Solaris x86/Sparc is only available with JRE and Linux HPPA, S390X, >>> PPC, IA64 and SDK only without JRE. The "index.html" includes the global >>> "download.js", therefore it applies also to the test section. >>> >>> So, when the browser tells, e.g., OS=Solaris, then always a download >>> link with wJRE builds should be offered, regardless if the checkbox is >>> checked or not. Linux 32/64 Debian always without JRE. And so on. >>> >>> The label text for the checkbox is updated. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Marcus >>> >>> >>> >>> Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> Hi--a quick update on this. >>>> >>>> I am making progress but NOT QUITE THERE yet! :( >>>> >>>> This is one of those cart before the horse issues (things changed later >>>> in the page but how to propagate them up), and well, some solved but >>>> ONE >>>> problem still remaining -- a function call to openItem that needs a URL >>>> fix. The inline ones I got to mess with through some JS. >>>> >>>> my test area is at -- >>>> http://download.openoffice.org/test/index_k.html >>>> >>>> more later... >>>> >>>> On 05/20/2010 04:10 PM, Marcus Lange wrote: >>>>> Bernhard Dippold wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Bernhard, >>>>> >>>>>> Could you divide the light green area in two areas? The upper in >>>>>> darker green (like the lower border of the upper area) and only the >>>>>> lower in light green. >>>>> I don't know if I hit the colors but the areas are now divided. >>>>> >>>>>> People intending to download directly will notice hover effect >>>>>> only if >>>>>> they are over the main download area, while clicking on the >>>>>> with/without JRE area will just toggle the checkmark. >>>>>> >>>>>> This would help to understand the different purposes of the two parts >>>>>> actually combined in the light green area. >>>>> Yes, the different events/actions need different areas. But, hm, do >>>>> you >>>>> really want to have 3 green areas? OK, here you are. :-) >>>>> >>>>>> PS: With a smaller window the new text is wrapped sub-optimal IMHO... >>>>> Fixed with the checkbox code inside a <p> section. >>>>> >>>>>> (and the background images for hover are visible below the normal >>>>>> ones...) >>>>>> If this is not reproducible with your browser and about 800px window >>>>>> width (look at RC and dev-OOo downloads), I'll upload a screenshot >>>>>> (SeaMonkey 2.0.4, Firefox 3.6.3) >>>>> This looks indeed quite ugly. Needs to be fixed (by an CSS expert). >>>>> >>>>> Best regards >>>>> >>>>> Marcus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- ============================================================ Kay Schenk ph: 530-898-5339 Applications Development and Enterprise Design CSU, Chico "Until you're ready to look foolish, you'll never have the possibility of being great." -- Cher --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
