hi-- I'm actually working on this today, so good to know...
and, by the way, I need to track down who "mla" is...is that you? I notice this page... http://download.openoffice.org/other.html#tested-full uh...has changed quite a bit and now "Download" is substituted in many cases for the version number. Was this on purpose? Also, with the testing I'm doing, if I disable javascript, the checkbox goes away (well that's OK). But I will also point out the instructions just won't work at all if the chekcbox is NOT available/showing.It is virtually impossible to take out the "-wJRE" on the fly. At this point, the link has already been generated. So, maybe these instructions need to be changed? Or...something else. But anyway, thanks for the info...this is indeed an interesting problem to say the least. On 06/16/2010 01:04 PM, Marcus Lange wrote: > Hello Kay, > > I've added some more exceptions for the JRE checkbox as Linux x86-64 RPM > and Solaris x86/Sparc is only available with JRE and Linux HPPA, S390X, > PPC, IA64 and SDK only without JRE. The "index.html" includes the global > "download.js", therefore it applies also to the test section. > > So, when the browser tells, e.g., OS=Solaris, then always a download > link with wJRE builds should be offered, regardless if the checkbox is > checked or not. Linux 32/64 Debian always without JRE. And so on. > > The label text for the checkbox is updated. > > Best regards > > Marcus > > > > Kay Schenk wrote: >> Hi--a quick update on this. >> >> I am making progress but NOT QUITE THERE yet! :( >> >> This is one of those cart before the horse issues (things changed later >> in the page but how to propagate them up), and well, some solved but ONE >> problem still remaining -- a function call to openItem that needs a URL >> fix. The inline ones I got to mess with through some JS. >> >> my test area is at -- >> http://download.openoffice.org/test/index_k.html >> >> more later... >> >> On 05/20/2010 04:10 PM, Marcus Lange wrote: >>> Bernhard Dippold wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bernhard, >>> >>>> Could you divide the light green area in two areas? The upper in >>>> darker green (like the lower border of the upper area) and only the >>>> lower in light green. >>> I don't know if I hit the colors but the areas are now divided. >>> >>>> People intending to download directly will notice hover effect only if >>>> they are over the main download area, while clicking on the >>>> with/without JRE area will just toggle the checkmark. >>>> >>>> This would help to understand the different purposes of the two parts >>>> actually combined in the light green area. >>> Yes, the different events/actions need different areas. But, hm, do you >>> really want to have 3 green areas? OK, here you are. :-) >>> >>>> PS: With a smaller window the new text is wrapped sub-optimal IMHO... >>> Fixed with the checkbox code inside a <p> section. >>> >>>> (and the background images for hover are visible below the normal >>>> ones...) >>>> If this is not reproducible with your browser and about 800px window >>>> width (look at RC and dev-OOo downloads), I'll upload a screenshot >>>> (SeaMonkey 2.0.4, Firefox 3.6.3) >>> This looks indeed quite ugly. Needs to be fixed (by an CSS expert). >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Marcus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > -- ============================================================ Kay Schenk ph: 530-898-5339 Applications Development and Enterprise Design CSU, Chico "Until you're ready to look foolish, you'll never have the possibility of being great." -- Cher --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
