Lars Nooden wrote:
On 06/28/2010 03:17 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
But old open bug documents are working means of communication (or
they're supposed to be), among users, developers, QA, release
engineering . . . They will require some more immediate solution.
Less urgent that one would expect if after a certain day no new issues
can be created in the old bug tracker. New issues would then be created
in the new bug tracker and the old ones closed out naturally over time.
There is still a question of what to do with issues that are still open
after a certain date, say a few months later. One option would be to
post updates to them telling people to re-enter them in the new bug
tracker if they wish the issue carried forward. The ones that are
orphaned probably weren't that pressing but if they are they will get
'rediscovered' and entered in the new bug tracker.
As I said on another mail in this group the migration plan there is to
migrate the old issuezilla database into a new bugzilla database and
than incrementally upgrade it with content grabbed from the website to
keep the downtime of the bugtracking system down and to keep all old
issues. This can be done because the issuezilla and the bugzilla
database design is very similar.
/Lars
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
Kind regards,
Bernd Eilers
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
