hmm, putting said counter into session should work well, and would
result in almost no syncing...

-igor


On Feb 12, 2008 10:52 AM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> no, requestcycle wont work. markup ids have to be unique across
> requests - for the lifecycle of the page.
>
> clustering is also something i didnt think about...
>
> -igor
>
>
>
> On Feb 12, 2008 10:49 AM, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The request cycle sounds like a good place to put such a counter. Then the
> > counter is request relative, and synchronized by default for the request.
> > Martijn
> >
> >
> > On 2/12/08, Ryan Sonnek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm definitely not against the idea, but I would caution introducing
> > > an application wide ID generator.  This would introduce a *single*
> > > synchronization point for component creation which *could* introduce a
> > > performance bottleneck.
> > >
> > > Only way to find out is to try, but this is just a word of caution.  =)
> > >
> > > On Feb 12, 2008 12:42 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > one of the nagging things on the lists is that markup id is not
> > > > available until render time, this gets a lot of users hung up. the
> > > > problem is that we use a counter inside the page to generate the
> > > > unique id. what if instead we use a static counter, that will make
> > > > markup ids unique across pages also. the only problem is that it will
> > > > make the id counter increment faster, but with a Long we wont run out
> > > > any time soon. we should also keep the id string as short as possible,
> > > > maybe encode the integer using [0-9a-zA-Z] instead of just [0-9], or
> > > > even to make it faster encode it into hex...
> > > >
> > > > if no objections are raised i will make the change...will be nice to
> > > > have a major improvement to go along with 1.3.2 anyways
> > > >
> > > > -igor
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst
> > Apache Wicket 1.3.1 is released
> > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.1
> >
>

Reply via email to