If you just want to double-check, Continuum setup would take less than ten minutes. I'll be available for any assistance you need. If you installed it and added one POM [1] it would automagically get all THIRTY TWO Wicket Stuff projects that I have moved over to wicketstuff-core building for you.
I had never used Continuum before, and am not typically impressed easily, but I have been VERY impressed with it. Regardless of what the issue is (TC / SF connection), I think it's worth looking into using it rather than TC since all of our projects (core and WS) are based on Maven - and Continuum is set up to build maven projects super easily. [1] - https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-core/pom.xml Just my $0.02... but I definitely think it's worth the time - and I don't mind doing it if you need the help, or if you install it I can set it up - whichever works best for you. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > I dont think installing continuum wil help at all it is just that > sourceforge is some how blocked. I will try to investigat that a bit > more, but it is not that teamcity is a problem the apache projects are > building just fine > > > On 29/11/2008, Jeremy Thomerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Who owns the wicketstuff.org server? Since TeamCity has been > continually > > having problems building against SF repo, I set up Continuum on my > server. > > It has been working fine. I'd like to see us get some permanent setup > that > > allows built artifacts to be deployed to the wicketstuff.org maven repo > > since that's the repo everyone has in their POM for wicketstuff projects. > > This will be especially important now that so many wicketstuff projects > will > > be able to be built together and released together. > > > > I see two options: > > 1 - We switch from TeamCity to Continuum on the wicketstuff.org site. > This > > would require someone with shell access installing Continuum or giving me > > access to do so. It's a VERY simple setup. Also, if we switch to > Continuum > > and then have problems we'll know instantly that there is a network issue > > between the wicketstuff.org server and SF (since my server has not had > the > > problem and been running Continuum against SF for weeks). > > > > 2 - Someone gives me information so that my server can SCP to the repo on > > wicketstuff.org. My server could continue to run the builds and then > SCP > > the artifacts to wicketstuff.org's repo. This would be fine with me as > > well. > > > > Whatever works best - I'd just like us to have some Continuous > Integration > > actually running and deploying snapshots and release artifacts. The next > > step will be to get the central maven repo to mirror the > > wicketstuff.orgreleased artifacts to central. I don't mind working > > through this at some > > point. > > > > -- > > Jeremy Thomerson > > http://www.wickettraining.com > > >