Hi, I've merged the PR [1] which introduces wso2base image. This base image will include packages that were previously installed from Puppet (zip and unzip), and those are removed from Puppet/Hiera side. With that we should be able to build WSO2 Docker images in offline mode.
wso2base image is pushed to DockerHub [2] as well. You don't need to build it locally. [1] https://github.com/wso2/dockerfiles/pull/46 [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/wso2/wso2base/ Thanks. On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Imesh Gunaratne <im...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi Isuru/Akila, > > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <isu...@wso2.com> > wrote: > > To summarize: > > - Publish a wso2 product specific docker image to a local docker > repository (we can even push to dockerhub, without the JDK distribution and > ask the users to provide the JDK when spinning up a container from the > image). > > A good suggestion, since we currently track product downloads for > analytics we might need to find a way to do the same with Docker if we were > to publicly share WSO2 Docker images. Otherwise using a local registry with > a base/product image would do. > > - Guide the users/developers to create their own Dockerfile extending > from the original wso2 product Docker image. > > We might need to solve 1, to do this. > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa <isu...@wso2.com> > wrote: > >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera < >> raviha...@wso2.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> I'm not against having a base image for the WSO2 Docker images. But, >> IMHO the advantages should be significant for doing so. AFAIU there is no >> significant advantage of doing so currently. But, this is my take only. >> Therefore lets get the input from the community on this matter. >> >> @Imesh: WDYT? >> >> Currently almost all of us use a base image locally to reduce the > internet bandwidth usage due to executing docker builds from scratch. > Therefore I think it would be better to push that to the remote repository. > > As Akila has mentioned the only downside of this is the image size being > increased by around 100 MB. When creating Docker images for production > deployment those optimizations can be taken into account. > > Thanks > >> >> -- >> Thanks and Regards, >> >> Isuru H. >> +94 716 358 048* <http://wso2.com/>* >> >> >> > > > -- > *Imesh Gunaratne* > Software Architect > WSO2 Inc: http://wso2.com > T: +94 11 214 5345 M: +94 77 374 2057 > W: https://medium.com/@imesh TW: @imesh > Lean . Enterprise . Middleware > > -- Akila Ravihansa Perera WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ Blog: http://ravihansa3000.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
