On Sat, Jun 25, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Akila Ravihansa Perera <[email protected] > wrote:
> Hi, > > I've merged the PR [1] which introduces wso2base image. This base image > will include packages that were previously installed from Puppet (zip and > unzip), and those are removed from Puppet/Hiera side. With that we should > be able to build WSO2 Docker images in offline mode. > > wso2base image is pushed to DockerHub [2] as well. You don't need to build > it locally. > Great work! Will try this out! Thanks > > [1] https://github.com/wso2/dockerfiles/pull/46 > [2] https://hub.docker.com/r/wso2/wso2base/ > > Thanks. > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Imesh Gunaratne <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Isuru/Akila, >> >> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 3:19 PM, Isuru Haththotuwa <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> To summarize: >> >> - Publish a wso2 product specific docker image to a local docker >> repository (we can even push to dockerhub, without the JDK distribution >> and >> ask the users to provide the JDK when spinning up a container from the >> image). >> >> A good suggestion, since we currently track product downloads for >> analytics we might need to find a way to do the same with Docker if we were >> to publicly share WSO2 Docker images. Otherwise using a local registry with >> a base/product image would do. >> >> - Guide the users/developers to create their own Dockerfile extending >> from the original wso2 product Docker image. >> >> We might need to solve 1, to do this. >> >> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Isuru Haththotuwa <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:54 PM, Akila Ravihansa Perera < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> I'm not against having a base image for the WSO2 Docker images. But, >>> IMHO the advantages should be significant for doing so. AFAIU there is no >>> significant advantage of doing so currently. But, this is my take only. >>> Therefore lets get the input from the community on this matter. >>> >>> @Imesh: WDYT? >>> >>> Currently almost all of us use a base image locally to reduce the >> internet bandwidth usage due to executing docker builds from scratch. >> Therefore I think it would be better to push that to the remote repository. >> >> As Akila has mentioned the only downside of this is the image size being >> increased by around 100 MB. When creating Docker images for production >> deployment those optimizations can be taken into account. >> >> Thanks >> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks and Regards, >>> >>> Isuru H. >>> +94 716 358 048* <http://wso2.com/>* >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> *Imesh Gunaratne* >> Software Architect >> WSO2 Inc: http://wso2.com >> T: +94 11 214 5345 M: +94 77 374 2057 >> W: https://medium.com/@imesh TW: @imesh >> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware >> >> > > > -- > Akila Ravihansa Perera > WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ > > Blog: http://ravihansa3000.blogspot.com > -- *Imesh Gunaratne* Software Architect WSO2 Inc: http://wso2.com T: +94 11 214 5345 M: +94 77 374 2057 W: https://medium.com/@imesh TW: @imesh Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
