Moon - No-one in the community supported your refusal to fix CI. No-one supported your license theory, but you refused to abandon it until two mentors told you you were wrong. No-one supported your demand that 208 not be merged without 702.
208 has waiting action on your part or your employees -- with all tasks that were my responsibility complete -- since September. So don't point the finger-this is your train wreck and yours alone. Your approach has been to create obstacles; when the community goes against you, you promise to act; but then you do nothing; and when time passes and I complain that nothing has happened, you create another obstacle and complain that I said something mean to you. That is not the Apache way. It also not honest. > On Mar 17, 2016, at 4:51 PM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > Amos, > > You seems always end up with personal attack and accuse someone when you > don't have reasonable answer. Your strategy is recognized well enough. > > But, please understand that your strategy will never work in this > community. Moreover your strategy is very much against the 'Apache way'. > > So, how about you try 'Apache way' this time? > That's the best way to get involved in this community and fastest way to > get what you want. Also it is more comfortable way which good for health of > everyone subscribing this mailing list :-) > > Everyone in this community will support you if you decided to change your > strategy to 'Apache way'. Let me know if you need any help. > > Thanks, > moon > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Moon, youve been impeding 208 since Felix asked you to. Your sudden >> recent interest in 702 is just more of the same. >> >> Your conduct has been obstructive and dishonest, and you've been thwarting >> the will of the community for months. >> >>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 3:35 PM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Amos, >>> >>> I had volunteered help fixing CI of 208. Hope you're able to distinguish >>> 'wiling to help' and 'committed to do something'. >>> >>> Please remember, everyone in this community are volunteers and no one >>> paid/committed to work on 208. >>> >>> I think you have some misunderstanding of philosophy of Apache project. >>> Please read following links carefully before you trying to prevent >>> community member involving 702 any further. >>> >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#philosophy >>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html >>> >>> Hope those links helps change your point of view to Apache project, >>> especially for concept of collaborative, open and respectful. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> moon >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:07 AM Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Moon you committed in December to fix CI and merge 208. In February, >>>> having broken your promise, you committed to stay out of it. >>>> >>>> PPMC review has been *complete* since Dexember. >>>> >>>> Your lack of integrity is truly astounding. >>>> >>>> If you will not honor your commitment to stay out voluntarily, then >>>> perhaps we need to begin a community discussion about your level of >>>> involvement. >>> >>> >>>>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 2:48 AM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Amos, >>>>> >>>>> There're no such commitment. I wanted to stay out because of it was too >>>>> noisy. but i can always be involved if i want. >>>>> >>>>> You're not trying to interrupt PPMC reviewing contribution, right? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> moon >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:58 PM Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Moon - you committed to stay out of these issues. If you're going to >> be >>>>>> involved at all, you should start by honoring the commitments you made >>>> in >>>>>> the past. >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Leemoonsoo <g...@git.apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request: >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-197717065 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> @echarles Can there be one integration test such as >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-server/src/test/java/org/apache/zeppelin/rest/ZeppelinSparkClusterTest.java#L87 >>>>>> ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and >> have >>>>>> your >>>>>>> reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this >>>>>> feature >>>>>>> enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, >>>>>> please >>>>>>> contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA >>>>>> ticket >>>>>>> with INFRA. >>>>>>> --- >>
