Moon - 208 has been ready for merge for six months. The reason it hasn't been merged is exclusively you--against the will of the community.
> On Mar 17, 2016, at 10:34 PM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > Amos, > > No one blocks you working on 208 and no one said we're not merging 208 when > it's ready. So please stop accusing community member regarding progress of > 208. > > More important thing i think you need to care is "Collaboration". > You don't need to worry about 702. Alternative implementation is not the > one you need to compete, devaluate and win, but the one you need to > collaborate, help and learn. > > You probably heard about "Community over code" [1]. and that exemplifies > Apache project. if you can show your ability to collaborate in the > community, that proves many more thing in addition to your code. > > Clearly accusing, devaluating someone else's work is not the way Apache > works. Please take one step back and look around you. Are people coming to > help you or are people scare away from you? Please think carefully about > what's the best way of spending your precious time. > > Thanks, > moom > > [1] http://theapacheway.com/ > > > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 2:09 PM Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Moon - No-one in the community supported your refusal to fix CI. No-one >> supported your license theory, but you refused to abandon it until two >> mentors told you you were wrong. No-one supported your demand that 208 not >> be merged without 702. >> >> 208 has waiting action on your part or your employees -- with all tasks >> that were my responsibility complete -- since September. So don't point the >> finger-this is your train wreck and yours alone. >> >> Your approach has been to create obstacles; when the community goes >> against you, you promise to act; but then you do nothing; and when time >> passes and I complain that nothing has happened, you create another >> obstacle and complain that I said something mean to you. >> >> That is not the Apache way. It also not honest. >> >>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 4:51 PM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Amos, >>> >>> You seems always end up with personal attack and accuse someone when you >>> don't have reasonable answer. Your strategy is recognized well enough. >>> >>> But, please understand that your strategy will never work in this >>> community. Moreover your strategy is very much against the 'Apache way'. >>> >>> So, how about you try 'Apache way' this time? >>> That's the best way to get involved in this community and fastest way to >>> get what you want. Also it is more comfortable way which good for health >> of >>> everyone subscribing this mailing list :-) >>> >>> Everyone in this community will support you if you decided to change your >>> strategy to 'Apache way'. Let me know if you need any help. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> moon >>> >>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:42 PM Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Moon, youve been impeding 208 since Felix asked you to. Your sudden >>>> recent interest in 702 is just more of the same. >>>> >>>> Your conduct has been obstructive and dishonest, and you've been >> thwarting >>>> the will of the community for months. >>>> >>>>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 3:35 PM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Amos, >>>>> >>>>> I had volunteered help fixing CI of 208. Hope you're able to >> distinguish >>>>> 'wiling to help' and 'committed to do something'. >>>>> >>>>> Please remember, everyone in this community are volunteers and no one >>>>> paid/committed to work on 208. >>>>> >>>>> I think you have some misunderstanding of philosophy of Apache project. >>>>> Please read following links carefully before you trying to prevent >>>>> community member involving 702 any further. >>>>> >>>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/how-it-works.html#philosophy >>>>> http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html >>>>> >>>>> Hope those links helps change your point of view to Apache project, >>>>> especially for concept of collaborative, open and respectful. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> moon >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:07 AM Amos B. Elberg <amos.elb...@gmail.com >>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Moon you committed in December to fix CI and merge 208. In February, >>>>>> having broken your promise, you committed to stay out of it. >>>>>> >>>>>> PPMC review has been *complete* since Dexember. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your lack of integrity is truly astounding. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you will not honor your commitment to stay out voluntarily, then >>>>>> perhaps we need to begin a community discussion about your level of >>>>>> involvement. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 2:48 AM, moon soo Lee <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Amos, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> There're no such commitment. I wanted to stay out because of it was >> too >>>>>>> noisy. but i can always be involved if i want. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You're not trying to interrupt PPMC reviewing contribution, right? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>> moon >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:58 PM Amos B. Elberg < >> amos.elb...@gmail.com >>>>> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Moon - you committed to stay out of these issues. If you're going to >>>> be >>>>>>>> involved at all, you should start by honoring the commitments you >> made >>>>>> in >>>>>>>> the past. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Mar 17, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Leemoonsoo <g...@git.apache.org> >> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Github user Leemoonsoo commented on the pull request: >>>> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/pull/702#issuecomment-197717065 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> @echarles Can there be one integration test such as >>>> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-zeppelin/blob/master/zeppelin-server/src/test/java/org/apache/zeppelin/rest/ZeppelinSparkClusterTest.java#L87 >>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>> If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and >>>> have >>>>>>>> your >>>>>>>>> reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this >>>>>>>> feature >>>>>>>>> enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not >> working, >>>>>>>> please >>>>>>>>> contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA >>>>>>>> ticket >>>>>>>>> with INFRA. >>>>>>>>> --- >>>> >>
