I saw one test failure: https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/
FYI On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure seems > to be gone. > > For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds: > #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7, > #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5 > where tests failed due to BindException > > Cheers > > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at >> the same time... bam. >> >> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs, >> that should help. >> >> Patrick >> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at the >> > same time: >> > >> > Building remotely on ubuntu4 >> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace >> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 >> > >> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in >> > parallel. >> > >> > Cheers >> > >> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See >> >> >> >> >> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/ >> ): >> >> >> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in >> use >> >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118) >> >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63) >> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use >> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method) >> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344) >> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336) >> >> at >> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199) >> >> at >> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74) >> >> at >> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67) >> >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95) >> >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125) >> >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517) >> >> at >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on >> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/ >> >>> >> >>> >> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/ >> >>> >> >>> Patrick >> >>> >> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time: >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/ >> >>> > >> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect >> >>> > at >> >>> >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129) >> >>> > at >> >>> >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199) >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > Patrick >> >>> > >> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar < >> maha...@hortonworks.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >> Good point Ted. >> >>> >> Eugene, >> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat >> >>> level? :) >> >>> >> >> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not. >> >>> >> >> >>> >> thanks >> >>> >> mahadev >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down >> root >> >>> cause ? >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Thanks >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the >> unit >> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran >> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be >> >>> >>>> working. >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> Patrick >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar < >> >>> maha...@hortonworks.com> >> >>> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >>>> > Hi all, >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 >> JIRAs are >> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix >> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550 >> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue. >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the >> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.*** >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so >> >>> that >> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out. >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > >> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/ >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > Should we release this? >> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>>> > thanks >> >>> >>>> > mahadev >> >>> >>>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >