I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl stuff.
Patrick On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > I saw one test failure: > > https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/ > > FYI > > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure seems >> to be gone. >> >> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds: >> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7, >> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5 >> where tests failed due to BindException >> >> Cheers >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >> >>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at >>> the same time... bam. >>> >>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs, >>> that should help. >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at the >>> > same time: >>> > >>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4 >>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace >>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 >>> > >>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in >>> > parallel. >>> > >>> > Cheers >>> > >>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See >>> >> >>> >> >>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/ >>> ): >>> >> >>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already in >>> use >>> >> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118) >>> >> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63) >>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method) >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344) >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336) >>> >> at >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199) >>> >> at >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74) >>> >> at >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67) >>> >> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95) >>> >> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125) >>> >> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517) >>> >> at >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on >>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/ >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/ >>> >>> >>> >>> Patrick >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time: >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/ >>> >>> > >>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect >>> >>> > at >>> >>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129) >>> >>> > at >>> >>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199) >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > Patrick >>> >>> > >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar < >>> maha...@hortonworks.com> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >> Good point Ted. >>> >>> >> Eugene, >>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat >>> >>> level? :) >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not. >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> thanks >>> >>> >> mahadev >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down >>> root >>> >>> cause ? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >>> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the >>> unit >>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also ran >>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to be >>> >>> >>>> working. >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> Patrick >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar < >>> >>> maha...@hortonworks.com> >>> >>> >>>> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> > Hi all, >>> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 >>> JIRAs are >>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical bugfix >>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550 >>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue. >>> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the >>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.*** >>> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little longer so >>> >>> that >>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out. >>> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >>>> > >>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/ >>> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this? >>> >>> >>>> > >>> >>> >>>> > thanks >>> >>> >>>> > mahadev >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>
