Given Eugene's findings on ZOOKEEPER-1557, I think we can continue rolling the current RC out. Others please vote on the thread if you see any issues with that. Folks who have already voted, please re vote in case you have a change of opinion.
As for myself, I ran a couple of tests with the RC using open jdk 7 and things seem to work. +1 from my side. Pat/Ben/Flavio/others what do you guys think? thanks mahadev On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using > lock ZooKeeper-solaris. > I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use > a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine. > I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added. > > Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 > have been green. > > Cheers > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > >> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl >> stuff. >> >> Patrick >> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > I saw one test failure: >> > >> > >> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/ >> > >> > FYI >> > >> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure >> seems >> >> to be gone. >> >> >> >> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds: >> >> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7, >> >> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5 >> >> where tests failed due to BindException >> >> >> >> Cheers >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at >> >>> the same time... bam. >> >>> >> >>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs, >> >>> that should help. >> >>> >> >>> Patrick >> >>> >> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at >> the >> >>> > same time: >> >>> > >> >>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4 >> >>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace >> >>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 >> >>> > >> >>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in >> >>> > parallel. >> >>> > >> >>> > Cheers >> >>> > >> >>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/ >> >>> ): >> >>> >> >> >>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already >> in >> >>> use >> >>> >> at >> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118) >> >>> >> at >> >>> >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63) >> >>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use >> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method) >> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344) >> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336) >> >>> >> at >> >>> >> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199) >> >>> >> at >> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74) >> >>> >> at >> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67) >> >>> >> at >> >>> >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95) >> >>> >> at >> >>> >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125) >> >>> >> at >> >>> >> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517) >> >>> >> at >> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113) >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on >> >>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far: >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/ >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/ >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Patrick >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time: >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/ >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect >> >>> >>> > at >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129) >> >>> >>> > at >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199) >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > Patrick >> >>> >>> > >> >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar < >> >>> maha...@hortonworks.com> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >> Good point Ted. >> >>> >>> >> Eugene, >> >>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat >> >>> >>> level? :) >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not. >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> thanks >> >>> >>> >> mahadev >> >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> >> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down >> >>> root >> >>> >>> cause ? >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt < >> ph...@apache.org> >> >>> >>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the >> >>> unit >> >>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also >> ran >> >>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to >> be >> >>> >>> >>>> working. >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> Patrick >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar < >> >>> >>> maha...@hortonworks.com> >> >>> >>> >>>> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>> > Hi all, >> >>> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 >> >>> JIRAs are >> >>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical >> bugfix >> >>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550 >> >>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue. >> >>> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the >> >>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.*** >> >>> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little >> longer so >> >>> >>> that >> >>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out. >> >>> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>> >>>> > >> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/ >> >>> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this? >> >>> >>> >>>> > >> >>> >>> >>>> > thanks >> >>> >>> >>>> > mahadev >> >>> >>> >>>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>
