The INFRA jira was resolved and I updated the jenkins jobs related to this issue.
Patrick On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 10:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >> I used zk-solaris for the time being. We'll have to have something >> added for ubuntu, must be a jenkins admin only operation. > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5366 > >> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Currently ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 are using >>> lock ZooKeeper-solaris. >>> I think ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 should use >>> a separate lock since they wouldn't run on a Solaris machine. >>> I didn't seem to find how a new lock name can be added. >>> >>> Recent builds for ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 and ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7 >>> have been green. >>> >>> Cheers >>> >>> On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> I've seen that before, it's a flakey test that's unrelated to the sasl >>>> stuff. >>>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > I saw one test failure: >>>> > >>>> > >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/9/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum/QuorumPeerMainTest/testHighestZxidJoinLate/ >>>> > >>>> > FYI >>>> > >>>> > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> > >>>> >> Up in ZOOKEEPER-1557, Eugene separated one test out and test failure >>>> seems >>>> >> to be gone. >>>> >> >>>> >> For ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7, the two failed builds: >>>> >> #10 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #7, >>>> >> #8 corresponded to ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 build #5 >>>> >> where tests failed due to BindException >>>> >> >>>> >> Cheers >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >>> Yes. Those ubuntu machines have two slots each. If both tests run at >>>> >>> the same time... bam. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I just added exclusion locks to the configuration of these two jobs, >>>> >>> that should help. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Patrick >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>> > I think that was due to the following running on the same machine at >>>> the >>>> >>> > same time: >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > Building remotely on ubuntu4 >>>> >>> > <https://builds.apache.org/computer/ubuntu4> in workspace >>>> >>> > /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/workspace/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7 >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > We should introduce randomized port so that test suite can execute in >>>> >>> > parallel. >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > Cheers >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>> > >>>> >>> >> Some tests failed in build 8 due to (See >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/8/testReport/org.apache.zookeeper.server/ZxidRolloverTest/testRolloverThenRestart/ >>>> >>> ): >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> java.lang.RuntimeException: java.net.BindException: Address already >>>> in >>>> >>> use >>>> >>> >> at >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:118) >>>> >>> >> at >>>> >>> >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ZxidRolloverTest.setUp(ZxidRolloverTest.java:63) >>>> >>> >> Caused by: java.net.BindException: Address already in use >>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind0(Native Method) >>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:344) >>>> >>> >> at sun.nio.ch.Net.bind(Net.java:336) >>>> >>> >> at >>>> >>> >>>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketChannelImpl.bind(ServerSocketChannelImpl.java:199) >>>> >>> >> at >>>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:74) >>>> >>> >> at >>>> >>> sun.nio.ch.ServerSocketAdaptor.bind(ServerSocketAdaptor.java:67) >>>> >>> >> at >>>> >>> >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.NIOServerCnxnFactory.configure(NIOServerCnxnFactory.java:95) >>>> >>> >> at >>>> >>> >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.ServerCnxnFactory.createFactory(ServerCnxnFactory.java:125) >>>> >>> >> at >>>> >>> >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.server.quorum.QuorumPeer.<init>(QuorumPeer.java:517) >>>> >>> >> at >>>> >>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.QuorumUtil.<init>(QuorumUtil.java:113) >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> fwiw: I setup jdk7 and openjdk7 jobs last night for branch34 on >>>> >>> >>> jenkins and they are looking good so far: >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_jdk7/ >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper_branch34_openjdk7/ >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> Patrick >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org> >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> > Doesn't look good, failed a second time: >>>> >>> >>> > >>>> >>> >>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> https://builds.apache.org/view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-jdk7/408/ >>>> >>> >>> > >>>> >>> >>> > java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Did not connect >>>> >>> >>> > at >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.ClientBase$CountdownWatcher.waitForConnected(ClientBase.java:129) >>>> >>> >>> > at >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> org.apache.zookeeper.test.WatcherTest.testWatchAutoResetWithPending(WatcherTest.java:199) >>>> >>> >>> > >>>> >>> >>> > >>>> >>> >>> > Patrick >>>> >>> >>> > >>>> >>> >>> > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Mahadev Konar < >>>> >>> maha...@hortonworks.com> >>>> >>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> >> Good point Ted. >>>> >>> >>> >> Eugene, >>>> >>> >>> >> Would you be able to take a quick look and point out the threat >>>> >>> >>> level? :) >>>> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> I have kicked off new build to see if its reproducible or not. >>>> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> thanks >>>> >>> >>> >> mahadev >>>> >>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>> >> On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> >>>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> >>> Should ZOOKEEPER-1557 be given some time so that we track down >>>> >>> root >>>> >>> >>> cause ? >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> Thanks >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 3, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Patrick Hunt < >>>> ph...@apache.org> >>>> >>> >>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> +1, sig/xsum are correct, ran rat an that looked good. All the >>>> >>> unit >>>> >>> >>> >>>> tests pass for me on jdk6 and openjdk7 (ubuntu 12.04). Also >>>> ran >>>> >>> >>> >>>> 1/3/5/13 server clusters using openjdk7, everything seems to >>>> be >>>> >>> >>> >>>> working. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> Patrick >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Mahadev Konar < >>>> >>> >>> maha...@hortonworks.com> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Hi all, >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.5. 2 >>>> >>> JIRAs are >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > addressed in this release. This includes the critical >>>> bugfix >>>> >>> >>> >>>> ZOOKEEPER-1550 >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > which address the client connection issue. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** Please download, test and VOTE before the >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > *** vote closes 12:00 midnight PT on Friday, Oct 5th.*** >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Note that I am extending the vote period for a little >>>> longer so >>>> >>> >>> that >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > folks get time to test this out. >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > >>>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~mahadev/zookeeper-3.4.5-candidate-0/ >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > Should we release this? >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > thanks >>>> >>> >>> >>>> > mahadev >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>>
