My comments below:

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Flavio Junqueira <f...@apache.org> wrote:

>
>
Feel free to contribute to my changes and suggest a different way in the
> jira. We can definitely work together on this, I just want to have this
> working soon.
>

​Ok. I don't want to slow down your current work in progress, so I will try
to see IF/WHAT I can contribute, but will let you know before hand.​ :)



>
> The script is bash, not python.


​Yup, in fact, I wrote the script with the intention of adding the option
of attaching the diff to the JIRA issue to zk-merge-pr.py tool. It woud be
for the sake of documeting the patch in the JIRA. Maybe I will create a new
issue proposing this once we have the other things sorted out, and only if
you guys think this is worth doing.



> It doesn't make it patch available mainly because if we make it patch
> available, then it will trigger the Jira QA, which will find no patch. It
> is a bit messy to trigger this second build, so I'm reluctant in doing it.
> I can see two options:
>
> - Only do github pull requests, in which case "Patch Available" in our
> workflow means pull request available
> - Somehow detect that there is a pull request and no trigger the Jira QA
>

​IMHO, the the first option is less brittle and effective.

Edward

Reply via email to