David Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Finally have you considered building Cygwin/X with the new SFU 3.5 tools > >fom Microsoft? It includes native ports of GCC to Windows, which may be > >better than Cygwin performance wise. I don't know however if the SFU SDK > >will allow you access to Windows services or only Unix ones. > > Sounds like a great idea. A native Windows build/port would be ideal, > IMHO.
I am working on getting both a native Windows port and OS/2 working properly again. I would much prefer *not* to have to use my own source tree and constantly patch in changes from thd XFree86 tree (or the X.org tree or whatever). Since it sounds like you think this is a good idea, can I get CVS commit access to complete this work? > >Also I don't recall if I offered to host the Cygwin port in our Perforce > >server. We already have a public 4.3.0 tree that has been patched with > >our SciTech SNAP driver code in it (for Linux), and I am in discussions > >with some of the other members of the community about starting a new > >project to take over where the XFree86 team appears to be stuck. If you > >are interested let me know. > > The more the merrier. I would much prefer to work within the official tree if possible. Regards, --- Kendall Bennett Chief Executive Officer SciTech Software, Inc. Phone: (530) 894 8400 http://www.scitechsoft.com ~ SciTech SNAP - The future of device driver technology! ~ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
