Hi All, The TON and NPI parameters are defined according to the GSM and the SMPP standards. Unfortunately how they are used in an SMSC does not seem to be standardised.
I have seen people using different values to achieve the same functionality using different SMSC implementations. This is also evident from the discussion on the list where some SMSC's do not accept 0 as a valid TON value and others expect it as the default value. Based on the requirement of trying to keep everyone happy I would recommend making these parameters available via configuration parameters. If they are set then they would be used but otherwise the existing mechanism should be used to calculate the values. Kindest Regards, Michael. ANAM Wireless Internet Solutions http://www.anam.com mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] +353 1 284 7555 Castle Yard, Saint Patrick's Road, Dalkey, County Dublin, Ireland > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Stipe Tolj > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2002 2:42 PM > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Contributions... generic NACK info and throttling > > > Alex Judd wrote: > > > > BTW did we add the ton/npi configuration file changes for > the SMPP driver > > to CVS yet? I can add the other configuration changes at > the same time. > > no it's yet not incorporated to cvs. It seems the pro and cons > discussion isn't leading us to something valueable. > > So, if you are advocating for one options try to convince the others > (Andreas mainly). > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Münsterstr. 248 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > wapme.net - wherever you are
