How about a quick code review and a commit of this?
Not to say that discussing the email list isn't important but ...
:)
Alex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Judd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alex Judd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Aaron Brady"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 2:54 PM
Subject: [Patch] To add timeouts to SMPP connections
> I've reworked Aaron's patch to be a bit more Kannel standard and allowed
for
> definition of enquire-link-retry externally to the code and a standard
value
> of 10 per suggestions.
>
> It's working for me here but would be good for one of the team to once
over.
>
> Alex
> Skywire
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Judd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Aaron Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:43 AM
> Subject: Re: Patch: To add timeouts to SMPP connections
>
>
> > Aaron
> >
> > Seeing as I picked this up in the first place, how about I rework your
> patch
> > to be a bit more flexible and submit it back for testing.
> >
> > This way we get the best of both worlds?
> >
> > Alex
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Aaron Brady" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 10:25 AM
> > Subject: Re: Patch: To add timeouts to SMPP connections
> >
> >
> > > > Looks good, however I'd potentially make it more configurable so
that
> > the
> > > X
> > > > x wait is one of the default settings and can be configured should
it
> > need
> > > > be.
> > >
> > > If it's easy enough, then I don't see why not, but I'm not altogether
> > > familiar with the internals of Kannel, so other than using your below
> code
> > > as a starting point, I wouldn't know what to do. Personally, I think
> that
> > > given enquire_link_interval is configurable that adds enough
> flexability -
> > > this is similar to how IRC servers do things, with a configurable
> > ping-time,
> > > but if you miss two then you're disconnected, but if people think it
> needs
> > > the extra option then I can try and add it.
> > >
> > > > For example
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > if (cfg_get_integer(&enquire_link_interval, grp,
> > > > octstr_imm("enquire-link-retry")) == -1)
> > > > enquire_link_interval = SMPP_ENQUIRE_LINK_RETRY;
> > > >
> > > > <other bits of code needed to map the parameter to the smpp
structure>
> > > >
> > > > if(date_universal_now() - smpp->last_enquire_received
> > > > > (smpp->enquire_link_retry *
> > smpp->enquire_link_interval))
> > > {
> > > >
> > > > etc.
> > > >
> > > > Also - would it make sense to send an extra send_enquire_link to
make
> > sure
> > > > that the other end is not contacting?
> > >
> > > I think that if the connection has gotten so far as to miss three
pings,
> > > it's not likely to recover, and manually sending another enquire_link
> > would
> > > complicate the code needlessly, but again, I'm sure there are people
> more
> > > knowledgable about this than me and if they think different, then I
can
> > try
> > > and implement it.
> > >
> > > Aaron
> > >
> >
>
