On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 09:45, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> sorry but Alex's patch is not closely conforms to spec. Please read smpp v3.4. 
> issue 1.2 page 165.
> Quote:
>       inactivity_timer - This timer specifies the maximum time lapse allowed 
> between _transactions_ , after which period of inactivity, an SMPP entity may 
> assume that the session is no longer active.
> 
> Transactions doesn't mean enquire_link. I seen already some of SMSC's that 
> doesn't undestand/reply to enquire_link. So this patch will just not work as 
> expected. My patch doesn't depend on enquire_link and notice every 
> transaction as proposed in smpp spec.
> 
> Comments please...

Ok - so it's more to do with any transaction rather than simply enquire
links .. my misinterpretation here - in this case I agree with you.

Cheers,
Alan


Reply via email to