Hi,
I meant, that with your solution user has to configure unified_prefix
for this SMSC what is not needed with my patch (posted long ago) with
stripped destination.
Another thing that your patch not does, is the fact that we have two
level unified prefix: one at SMSC level and another one at global level.
Your patch seem not use global level unified prefix.
Another thing that I don't like is to not force SMSC modules to call
unified_prefix function. IMO it would be better to extend dlr_find
function with unified_prefix parameter and do all the magic in dlr_find
function that then forces SMSC module to call unified_prefix.
Thanks,
Alex
Olivier Dormond wrote:
Hello,
Alexander Malysh wrote:
P.S. I find MNC's solution acceptable too but it need more user
configuration.
Great! What kind of additional configuration would you like to see ?
A dedicated dlr_unified_prefix ?
Cheers,
Olivier
