Hello,
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
P.S. I find MNC's solution acceptable too but it need more user
configuration.
yep, I like the "idea" in it's base too, since it "assumes" that Kannel
does has it's own MSISDN format scheme, which we should have actually.
But I dislike the fact that user's may "forget" to use the
unified-prefix within the smsc groups and also that they are "not aware"
of the fact they would need one.
If that's the main problem, I think it simply needs to be addressed.
Falling back the global unified_prefix in case no one is defined for
the smsc is conceptually fine for me. The only problem I see as stated
in my previous mail (Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) is that
accessing the global unified_prefix needs some instrumentation because
it's presently not accessible from the code in gw/smsc/*.c
The simplest instrumentation might be to add a field for the global
unified_prefix in the SMSCConn struct. Can we agree on such a scenario ?
Cheers,
Olivier
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile News Channel Direct phone: +41 21 317 50 25
Olivier Dormond Central: +41 21 317 50 20
Av. de la Gare 10
1003 Lausanne Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
