> On 07/11/2016 10:49 AM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> >> Any kind of feedback after package gets into updates repository should
> >> be denied, I can't think of a case where package moves to updates
> >> repository and bodhi still allows to add comments/karma. Any feedback
> >> after that can be either reported in bugzilla or to the package
> >> maintainers directly. Its not like providing positive or negative
> >> karma will make any changes to already pushed package to updates
> >> repository.
> > 
> > I do have valid use cases. We've had examples of important packages having
> > been pushed stable too quickly and breaking some computers (think kernel,
> > mesa). The bodhi comments can then be used to provide a description of the
> > problem, suggest any workarounds or fixes, and also link to more
> > information e.g. in the bugzilla or common bugs wiki, etc. The Bodhi pages
> > are easy to find (if I perform a system update and the computer breaks, I
> > look at what was included in the last update, and look at any bodhi
> > feedback for those packages), so it makes perfect sense to inform people
> > there. It's much harder to search bugzilla to find issues with a
> > particular package.
> > 
> 
> Well, IMHO for description of the problem and fixes Bugzilla is the
> right place. It's a bug in a stable package then, no testing feedback
> anymore.

Yes, of course, Bugzilla is the right place to deal with the bug. However, 
Bodhi is a much better place to inform affected people about it (e.g. link the 
bug). That's what I was trying to convey.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to