On Mon, 2016-07-11 at 06:37 +0000, Raphael Groner wrote: > I got karma on packages that were in stable already for a long time. The > karma system is too tolerant in my eyes. > > Why is it possible to give +1 to stable packages? Bodhi may deny or at least > impede such actions, -1 or neutral comments should be still possible though > for users having issues. > > In case of testing packages, maybe it's a good idea to delay write > access to karma system for some hours after new package got it into > bodhi. We already have a blocking phase for edits from maintainer > there, could it be extended to the karma system for both pending and > testing status?
The 'blocking phase' isn't some kind of by-policy cool-down period, it's simply a technical thing: updates are locked while any kind of 'push' involving that update is in progress, for strictly technical reasons (if you edit the update in such a way that it shouldn't be pushed, while it's being pushed, things can get out of sync). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
