On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:49:09PM -0600, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 01:12:03PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 05:57:53PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > > > mistake that caused files to go missing, and was never detected by the
> > person
> > > > making the change, because of the use of globs. So I agree it is good
> > practice
> > > > to explicitly list files without globs whereever it is practical todo
> > so. I'd
> > > > make an exception for files which don't have functional impact eg
> > don't list
> > > > 1000 HTML files individually, but it is always worth listing
> > everything in
> > > > /usr/bin, and /usr/lib(64) explicitly without globs.
> > >
> > > I used to agree with this, but I've come around to thinking that spec
> > > files should be smaller, less complicated, and more automatable. I
> > > think we'd be better having a post-build test warning that this package
> > > has files missing from the previous build. That could be advisory, or
> > > it could even gate, with the packager clearing the gate by updating the
> > > file list in the test, rather than in the spec file.
> >
> > The further down the workflow a problem is detected the more time expensive
> > / disruptive it is to fix it. So while having post-build tests to validate
> > lots of things is great (and I wish we had more of it in Fedora), I see it
> > as complementary to anything that we can do to detect problems earlier. I
> > rather see failures right away when I test the new RPM build locally, than
> > waiting to push it through koji and wait again for post-build tests to find
> > the problem, as by that time I've context switched my mind away to a
> > different bit of work.
> 
> 
> I don't have the infra experience to implement, but what about adding
> adding a pkgdiff option to fedpkg where it would complete a scratch build
> (--srpm if necessary) and then run pkgdiff against it and the current
> packages in the repository and putting the report somewhere accessible?

My typical scenario is to use a combination of "fedpkg local"
and "fedpkg scratch-build". So if there's a way to run tests on
the results of either or both of those, that could be a useful
thing.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to