On Sunday, December 15, 2019 12:29:18 PM MST Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 7:52 PM John M. Harris Jr <joh...@splentity.com>
> 
> wrote:
> > Not working means broken.
> 
> Part of this proposal is removing optical media from supported installation
> methods.

That was not brought up elsewhere in this thread. Who is considering this, and 
why? That would mean that a large portion of users would *not be able to 
install Fedora*.

> From your point of view, Fedora is broken right now because, for example,
> it doesn't work from USB Media created by UNetbootin most of the time.

UNetbootin has never been a supported method of creating USB media.

> It'll be the same, optical media will get delisted from supported
> installation methods, so Fedora wouldn't be broken if it doesn't work from
> installation source created using an unsupported method/media . .... Or, if
> you don't agree with that, then it's already broken ;)

Optical media is a supported installation method.

-- 
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to