On Mon, 07 Dec 2020 10:21:35 -0600
Michael Catanzaro <mcatanz...@gnome.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2020 at 7:33 am, James Szinger <jszin...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> > Undelivered -devel packages and modularity are killer anti-features
> > of EL 8—it is way too hard to build the software I need.  
> 
> Honestly I don't think modularity is a serious problem for end users. 
> Missing -devel packages is unbelievably frustrating, though. And EPEL 
> just doesn't contain as much as Fedora does, in general.

I find the modularity end-user documentation to be woefully
inadequate, especially for developers.

> So for personal servers... well, I've never seen Fedora Server broken 
> by automatic updates. I don't think I would use Fedora Server for 
> critical business infrastructure, but it works well enough for my 
> personal needs. The odds of encountering problems with Fedora are 
> simply way lower than the odds of discovering that EPEL lacks
> something that I want, or an essential -devel package that doesn't
> exist.

I have found updates to Fedora server software to be less disruptive
than the desktop updates.  I also find many small updates easier to
manage than a few big updates.  Our sysadmin at work spent most of
2020 updating the server fleet from CentOS 6 to CentOS 8.  My software
was easy to deal with since I develop and test on Fedora.  A good test
suite is essential.

Jim
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to