Dne 18. 08. 21 v 15:15 Didik Supriadi napsal(a):
On 8/18/21 6:32 PM, Iago Rubio wrote:
I pointed my browser to the orphaned packages that need new
maintainers(3) page, as it seems the most appropriate for the task, and
it gave me some guidelines and a link to the "Lists of Orphan and
Retired Packages"(4) where I found a 500 response.
I have informed the webmaster at fedoraproject.org email address of the
issue.
I think ppl now can go to
https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/user/orphan to see
orphaned packages.
Then I went to read again the guidelines (6). It's a 68 sections
document, so seems a bit daunting. I went to the "Naming Guidelines"
section and it was a 141,600 words page.
I am sure an abridged version for newcomers would be really helpful.
It going to take a while to go through that document.
You don't need to understand all of them at once, but you may need to
skim the guidelines.
Ironically, I find the Review guidelines [1] more practical for start,
because they list the basics what should be done during package review.
The packaging guidelines are useful source if the package gets more complex.
Vít
[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ReviewGuidelines/
"Don't worry too much about it though---once you've done a few
packages and a few reviews, you know where to find the info."
e.g. Referencing source ->
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/SourceURL/ ,
etc.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
