On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 11:34 PM Stephen Smoogen <ssmoo...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 17:26, Leigh Scott <leigh123li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Is this some sick joke? >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2104255 > > Hyperbole aside, it isn't a joke. Looking at the chain we see a common > problem where subversion relies on java-11-openjdk and without it is going to > cause a lot of packages to be removed. Either subversion needs to lose that > requirement or a lot of packages are going to get removed as failure to build > in i686. > > libglvnd-glx<-mesa-libGL<-libxcb<-doxygen<-git<-subversion<-java-11-openjdk-devel
It appears that the script that generated this data and filed bugs for packages affected by the removal of Java packages on i686 was a bit over-zealous. I can imagine that half the distro is counted as "affected", just because of the git <- subversion <- java dependency chain. I already closed two of the bugs that were assigned to me as "NOTABUG" because it's not on me to fix this problem, but rather on the maintainer of either git or subversion. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
